How CD players got boring…
and why the Technics SL-P1200 is one of the exceptions.
This one took me a long time to make inspite of its modest length. I’ve put this down to the fact that it’s really two different videos in one.
In the first half I take a look at the rapid early evolution of CD player design - up to the point where that evolution pretty much stopped just as soon as it had started.
I felt this backstory was needed before I could go on to explain why I find the Technics SL-P1200 that I demonstrate in the second half, to be so appealing.
I hope you enjoy it.
It’s been a funny old week here, I feel I’ve fallen way behind on everything so I must apologise if I haven’t managed to reply to everyone’s messages. I’ve 565 emails flagged for a reply - those are just the ones that I really wanted to get to...one day.
Thanks for all your kind words, stay well and keep smiling.
Comments (111)
I always said that the CD was a thing of beauty.
Great news,,just make sure you have a variety of new belts at the ready,,they rot in a hurry on these,Bought my Sony with a table error .but changed the two belts and it was perfect again,,,Good Luck Mat!
Great stuff as usual.Have you considered covering the CD Mega Changers by Sony Pioneer etc? They came in 25,,50,,100,,200,,300,,then 400 capacity's as they evolved.Even DVD and BluRay versions later on.,As i love CDs still,i got a Denon DCM 5000,considered to be the daddy of mega changers,All metal construction and 16kg,only took 100 discs but what a machine,also played HDCD which was new to me lol.ive since got a Sony 300 player and loving it.cheers
Yes I do have a couple of these in storage that I intend to take a look at one day.
Another fine Video Mat, its funny I have a Bang and Olufsen 9000 which has all the CDs on display, i actually made a video about it. https://youtu.be/jPNwggbd7SE As there weren't any other reviews of it on youtube. But since buying it, i needed to justify the purchase, by getting CDs, and as they are always on display, you sometimes choose which CDs will be played based on how they look. And i also agree that seeing the CD move does visualise the playing of music. I would greatly appreciate it if you could watch it, maybe when you are a bit bored or there isnt anything good on tv. :) Cheers
I’ll watch that later, thanks. I’ve had a 9000 on my ebay searches for years now, ever since I decided I should get a unique CD player for the system. It’s still half in my mind, but I ended up moving on to other things.
I hope it's not too late to start building that HiFi I always wanted in the 90s. It only took 30 years to have the space AND the disposable income. :)
Interesting Facts. When Technics realised DJs were going to start using CDs over vinyl, the professional models you’ve mentioned were made in conjunction with DMC in Slough. They run the annual World DJ Championships (sponsored by Technics), and they wanted to ensure when SL1200 turntables were replaced in night clubs, Technics CD Players were installed. Technics didn’t follow the recommendations made by DMC DJs and as a result Pioneer took the lead as the ‘must have’ DJ CD Player with their CDJ range. If you’re interested in any more info, let me know. I was head of production at DMC for 3 years, so I have first hand knowledge. Tom
Thanks for the kind offer. I wouldn’t know what to ask, but if something comes up, I’ll know who to ask.
I'm loving the comments feed on this one. Plenty of "I can see the disc spinning in my B&O", "how come you didn't mention the SL-1200?" and "my CD player from 1985 plays burnt discs just fine!". Never change, YT commenters.
How many people are stating categorically things like ‘well actually they hid CDs away in a draw is due to legal reasons to stop people getting blinded, that’s why you can’t have a window’ etc etc. I don’t get why so many say things like they’re facts when it’s clear they know absolutely nothing about the subject. All they’d need to do is type ‘cd player’ into Amazon and (on my UK search) four out of the first six results show a player with no lid at all…not even a clear one. I wonder if I’ve gone blind just by looking at the pictures online.
Mat, this is completely unrelated to this topic, but I made an interesting observation. In your first MiniDisc unwrapping video https://youtu.be/RPWkrwvAT0M you featured a certain Panasonic with fun retro colors. I was doing my typical eBay rounds and saw this item: https://www.ebay.com/itm/125112978411. Now I don't know if it was intentional but I think they were echoing back to their earlier design - what do you think? Screenshot comparison: https://ibb.co/j3mk1tW Note: there may have been another MD that looked even closer to that design, but I couldn't find it on the videos.
It’s very possible you’re right - there is a resemblance. Maybe there’s a whole series of these things.
Thanks for the video Mat. I remember my first CD player in the early 1980's. One of my favourite CDs (Jean Michel Jarre - Magnetic Fields) had indexes in track 1. Most modern players don't support index markers any more.
Can anyone here tell me what type of CD player Hideo Kojima has? It can be seen here as well as several of his other posts: https://www.instagram.com/p/CXJQEh5vEJT/?utm_medium=copy_link
That picture appears to show an amplifier as it’s displaying AUX.
I really thought it was just me who liked getting dizzy from watching CDs spin! This brought memories, as I had this micro system with the cd at the top and a window, but it was really awkward for me to look into because how I had it set up. At any rate I wanted it badly on my CD player. But my Panasonic had no window 😞 so I always was envious of people I saw at the library with one of them you could peek inside
The original Rega Planet (1997) was once my dream machine: https://www.stereophile.com/cdplayers/634/index.html (the writer mentions his dislike of drawer mechanisms, BTW) Couldn't afford it at the time (in today's money, about €1300 — or $2000 Bruneian), so it remained a dream. Ripping to FLAC is my preferred method of playing CDs since years now, so there's no nostalgia purchase of a Planet planned either. Still, I do enjoy its design and regard it as probably the best designed CD player ever. It has just the right amount of "prettiness" balanced with rugged utilitarianism that appeals to me. BTW, noticed that your Technics has an Emphasis LED. A rare feature, mostly seen on early players, which would indicate that the CD being played uses pre-emphasis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_Disc_Digital_Audio#Audio_format Also, I've heard it claimed that those windowed B&O players could be sensitive to flash photography. Possibly a myth, but worth trying with your Technics to see how it holds up?
Now THAT is a CD player! Very concise video too. I think I have owned a few of the nasty boring ones featured over the years too
That's a great video. I enjoyed the intro essay and, as you said, it whets the appetite for the demo. Thank you!
Awesome Mat! The Sony CDP-302 and its pricier but identical twin brother the CDP-520ES were traditional players available in 1985. Both had a clear window above the drawer and an evil green light inside to let you mesmerize yourself for hours by watching the disc whirl around. I actually have and still use my CDP-302. It was the first CD player I ever owned. Like your Technics - these Sony's are super fast at reading the ToC and the direct-drive sled changes tracks lightning fast. It's it an amazing player for its time. Some pics: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AuNvMH5MAYNOkvdrJA7qO2xcAZM6xw?e=i9quY3
It’s almost like Sony decided that hiding the disc was a mistake. Nice machine.
I really enjoyed your introduction - and the demonstration of course but your intro was quite thought-provoking. I hadn't given the design of CD players any thought really. I reckon you scripted that. It flowed well and made your arguments in a persuasive way. Nice video, well done, Mat. S.
Yes the whole thing was reverse-scripted, or at least that’s what I call it when I get all the clips together in the order that fit with the story in my head and then write a script that fits the clips.
Excellent video, as always, sir. I can relate to the Analog Meters - my Lafayette 5050 has both signal strength and signal center meters - one of the reasons I got it. I don't think anything today has either of those meters.
*If* anyone has a tuner, it's digital. Tuning is "perfect" - 97.7 MHz is 97.7 MHz. Assuming it's properly aligned. Otherwise, 97.7 might be 97.658 ... Sad, in a way.
OK, yes, great piece as always but really, that model *has* to be top shelf ... so that you can get discs in! :-D Just had a similar discussion about the gizmosity of music playback devices in another place. Today, you can put a couple of plug things in your ears and hear, in extremely high quality, just about every piece of music ever made almost instantly. And yet, something is missing. Adjusting the tone arm *perfectly* and threading the tape through the heads and even tuning in the "FM Multiplex" signal was part of the deal and without it ... I don't know. Something.
The end of that last paragraph '... I don't know. Something' - is my reasoning behind doing most things.
Like you, I have a collection of aesthetically pleasing pieces, and yes, some are B & O. I also have a soft spot for top loading cassette decks, which I scorned in my youth. I never put much thought into why CD players are boring, but I think you’re right - nothing to watch. I see in the comments mentions of mega changers. I gave one to my father in law, and when he passed I got it back. I loaded it up with Rhino’s Have A Nice Day and Didn’t I Blow Your Mind compilations, but still never used it much. But now I’m thinking I should make a plexiglass cover to replace the metal one, and put it next to my Telex 8-track changer and Panasonic cassette changer carousels. That might be fun!
It's a shame for all that technology to be hidden away out of site.
The thing that caught my eye with this machine (other than all of its cool features) is the electronics diagram printed on the top left of its face. It's not a complete schematic diagram, but appears to show just enough circuit detail to make it a bit more than a purely decorative element. Kind of like a graphic way to show off its technical features rather than the fancy script shown on your Denon turntable.
When I first saw this machine that section stood out for me too - but I just saw it as being an unusual use of space. It seemed like something being used to fill in a dead area and I also felt like it should be back-illuminated. I even went as far as checking videos of other models to see if there was a bulb out on mine. I suspect it's there though because it's easer to leave out a full width oblong of metal in this section than it would be to cut only a half width aperture - and they used the diagram to fill out the left hand side. Still it would look nicer if it lit up in green.
I'll be gutted when the player dies and I can't get it repaired. I was lucky when the drawer mech recently locked up and a local chap did fix it (although wasn't cheap). He did say that folks should service their old hi-fi kit as the grease drys out and hardens (which is what stopped my drawer working). One area I found the external DAC made a difference was when streaming some lockdown concerts recently. The DAC (in my case an Audiolab M-DAC) was a noticeable upgrade to the computer's inbuilt audio. Also made a nice way to integrate the Mac Mini to the hi-fi. Got to love the Mac Mini's optical out (do they still have that?) Otherwise I'm happy with my kit and don't tend to use it much.
Great video Mat. Been looking forward to this one after you recently teased it and it didn't disappoint. It looks so at home in your hi-fi. I remember seeing these in the Technics catalogue around the end of the 80's. I couldn't afford one or have space for one but instead saved up and got the SL-P777 from my Saturday job at a Camera and Hi-fi shop. The player is still serving me well over 30 years later with the original laser although I may come to regret not replacing it when replacements were still available. Mine might just be a standard drawer player but it does have a little lighted mirror above the drawer so you can see the spinning disc and the option of audio level meters on the display which was great for setting levels for mix tapes. It also has the cueing options with a jog dial. I used another earlier Technics deck with a jog dial in amateur theatre and it was great for finding what you wanted when making the sound f/x and music cues for a show - we used to record to 1/4" tape then Minidisc - all file based now even in amateur theatre. My Technics player has a digital output and I recently tried it with a modern hi-fi DAC which to my surprise didn't make that much of an improvement. Technics made such great kit.
That's a really nice model. Pretty much does the same as this and more besides, but in a more consumer friendly package. I've got to say that I never really get the idea of external DACs - unless something was very very wrong with the internal one I'm almost certain I'd never be able to tell the difference - however much money was spent on it.
Always been a fan of the Technics stuff. I bought an A900s Amplifier many many years ago and it's still going strong today (and still looks great too). I never knew so many features were available on a CD player but I suppose in professional use it would totally make sense. No doubt a little easier to work with than vinyl but still will seem a little prehistoric to many when compared to the computer control radio studio we have now.
Nice video Mat. One gotta love a machine like that. When I was young, I’d love to have a jog dial.
I confess to not being a cd fan and just had a cheapo midi system back in the day. However, I noted your points about top loading and is it only ‘boom boxes’ including those still being made that have a top loading system too?
I think you're right. A lot of the cheaper ones use a clip-on hub like a PC drive too.
SL-P1200...that brings back memories. That exact model was used in the production studio of 98.7 KLUV where I used to intern, then later work in the mid 1990s.
Watching your media playback is what I like to call "Mechanical Music". I never gave it much thought until I inherited my grandfather's RT-909 and I just enormously enjoy watching music playback while those big 10.5 inch reels turn. I'll be fixing up my old Sony turntable (linear drive is sticking) next.
Too chunky for what I’d like in a CD player, but it’s the all lower case helvetica that sells it for me 😅
I used to have one of those Philips wall hung systems with the vertical CD player and you’d often find people just watching the disk spin, as they’d never seen it before. Sadly, it died in a big thunderstorm.
What a lovely machine. Never seen it before. Very much deserves the top of the rack space. (Oooooh, do I spot that JPN CD / minidisc combo machine....? Think it's been in the background before...)
Yes it's made a few brief appearances - most prominently in this video https://youtu.be/5ufOfV40fx0?t=665
Finally you include Fijian Dollars prices! No questions left.
I'm completely with you on the importance of both seeing the media move and of getting some visible indication of progress. Plenty of knobs, buttons and coloured lights are also important, so this CD player definitely gets a thumbs up from me. btw, I was persuaded to buy a set of £50 cables to connect my turntable to my amplifier. Guess what? Couldn't hear any difference. Great video, thanks, Mat.
For years there’s been arguments over things like speaker cables, interconnects and power supplies affecting sound…I’ve never heard a difference, but I’m not saying there isn’t one…it’s just beyond my comprehension. One exception though is HDMI cables, you can get two cables that are supposedly the same latest spec, but one will drop the sound every now and again and blank the picture whereas another one won’t - so buying cheap isn’t always the best option.
Wow. What an impressive machine. Was that the first few bars of Charles Aznavour’s La Bohème? You do have good taste, Mat!
It was.
There's something about how you described the surface attributes of certain audio components that reminded me of how Hyacinth Bucket would unfailingly mention the refined features of her possessions as though they were part of the official name of the product. Which inspired a mental puzzle: what kind of hi-fi would Hyacinth have bought for her parlor in the early nineties? She's social-climbing, wants people to think of her as posh. The Buckets have a comfortable middle-class income. She's likely to be impressed by marketing copy lingo like "champagne-gold brushed metal" and "solid wood end panels with fine-grain rosewood effect veneer." Would she choose a legitimately impressive brand and get the cheapest gear in the range? Would she go for a second- or third-tier brand to get components with more buttons and dials and indicators on them? (I'm seeing her as a Bang & Olufsen customer.)
Schaub Lorenz 5001 Music Center; she'd stick with the extremely expensive classics, methinks.
That's a nice looking CD player. I love these retro tech videos. After finding a 110+1 CD jukebox, I've become slightly obsessed with them. I got one of the Sony 400 disc changers for Christmas. Seems there are a lot of the 200, 300 and 400 Sony models available. Have you had any interest in those?
I've got a couple of the 400s sat in storage. One day I'll get to them.
That SL-P1200 is magnificent. I bet it even has a built-in ink pad that automatically applies a green stripe to the edge of the disc, too.
I've been trying to obtain (without success) a certain audiofool device for quite a while that takes the sharpie idea up to another level. One day.
Your montage of "components with drawers" included a design language I've always liked: the operational panel/display that serves as the front of the loading drawer. It's not a practical choice by any means. But it creates a perpetual connection between the physical media and its interface. The button the user presses has an effect on a physical object just behind that button.
That's something I really like too - it's a bit of a James Bond moment whenever a display moves to reveal something else behind.
Maybe I should get one of these, I never play CDs because it's too boring, I prefer transferring them to tape (R2R or cassette)
Its pretty much a CD version of the SL 1200 turntable, the base is exactly the same as is the model number. Either way its a wicked cool machine!!!
I was just going to say that. Even the pitch controlling capabilities are pretty similar. Obviously both were designed with DJ’s in mind.
I loved my multidisc carousel player, but the real workhorse from my CD listening for 20-odd years was a really uninteresting black thing with a fax machine like name. I bought it mainly because it had a really good 1/4" headphone jack (which is usually how I listen)
I don't play CDs anymore, but they were my preferred physical format, and I greatly miss the "calendar" view of tracks on late 1980s CD players.
After watching this video, I wonder at the performance of this model Casio CD/Cassette machine: https://www.ebay.com/itm/324711969717 🤔 Description on this particular one says disc player is faulty, though. 😐
I do remember having that one (or a very similar model) on a short list when I was saving up for my first CD player.
I had never seen any of those sexy beasts before...now which one to get....?
Thanks for sharing that beautiful device with all the wonderful things, most useful CD player ever
Great video! Made me want to find the first CD player I ever used which was in the vertical orientation. My parents bought this terrible combo unit back in the late 80s or early 90s. Complete garbage but it seemed so high tech to me https://www.ebth.com/items/2578984-lxi-series-stereo-system
Maybe it's time for me to get that fifty CD vertical carrousel out of the storage space.
TBH my favourite TM videos are the ones where Mat gives a history lesson. I find them very interesting and there's usually a really neat product demo as well. Speaking of how I love things with effort put into them, that reminds me of how much I love the look of '80s CD players. I have a late '80s Sony that I think is pretty cool. It might be a more orthodox looking drawer-loading unit, but it has buttons marked from 1 to 20 allowing for direct track access to the first 20 tracks on a CD. The little matching grid on the VFD showing tracks 1 through 20, with each number blanking out after each track is played, is a tiny detail that I particularly enjoy. I need to get out more.
I like that feature too - there's something very pleasing about those tiny sharp VFD number grids.
Interestingly, Philips developed and announced a "vertical" CD player, the CD400, and I distinctly remember that when I went to the Firato in Amsterdam in 1982 where they were demonstrating CD, that was the player they used, with an ABBA disc in it. I took home some flyers that had all the first Philips CD players in it: The CD100 that doesn't even have a time display, only a track display that's built like a VU meter, and they also made some other systems where the entire mechanism was on a drawer. The CD400 was in there too, but guess what: The most awesome looking CD player they developed, never went into production. Philips has a way of doing that. The DCC850 was also a way cooler recorder than the DCC900 and they made a preproduction run of the 850 and sent it to several magazines for review. But the only first-generation recorder they made was the 900. Anyway, great video as always. I can see you put a lot of extra work in this one; great editing! Thanks for posting!
Yes it's a shame that they chose to hide the artwork of the DCCs away too - a rather odd decision after all the work put into the cassette design. I also liked the look of the prototype DCC personal stereo with the clear lid. Apparently Abba had the first pop CD - any early titles being classical.
Along with records and tapes I still buy CDs very often because second hand it’s almost cheaper than pirating the music… friend of mine has recently started collecting records and loves the physical aspect - I recently suggested CDs to him alongside his records for the aforementioned reasons, he couldn’t have been less interested.
A few years ago The Guardian called CDs 'Hipster Kryptonite' - I think that might be about to change slightly. However if you're into collecting old music, now seems a opportune time to stock up on used CDs. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2018/aug/08/cds-resurgence-hipster-kryptonite-compact-discs-vinyl-format-music
Really neat to see the other end of the range having grown up with a SL-P117 of similar vintage.
Very good - both halves. Now of to search eBay…. again.
I've been looking at Rega top-loaders this week, predominantly the Apollo or Saturn models. Not only is the current Apollo stupendously out of my price range at a mere £800, but the lids on the earlier ones on eBay are clear, rather than black on current ones. Oh, and considerably cheaper. Unlike you, I have a fair few CD-Rs though, so no idea if these earlier models would take them.
I always wanted one of the demo CD players found in HMV and similar shops, with multiple CDs spinning away. I never got one. I did just stumble across a guy called Unobtec on Instragram that built himself a CD player with the disc completely exposed, maybe worth a look. He also makes some very interesting cassette players.
Open CD players are really easy to make if that's your thing - a whole cd mech can be bought for peanuts...but I'm more into the classic tech than an Alibaba special.
Thank you for rescuing me from this general winter malaise, Mat! That machine is a thing of great beauty and function - and Technics to boot. Even I, as a certified CD un-enthusiast, can wholly appreciate that! And LOL.. "if it falls on you, it'll kill you." And... Oh, hello there you dear TM Hi-Fi system! How long has it been? Oh, hello there you dear Hewlett-Packard calc watch! Yikes, I'm feeling like George Bailey running through Bedford Falls. Dear CD Player sellers: Don't leave your CDs in the player, please. Dear MiniDisc Player sellers: Leave any of your MDs in, please. Dear R2R Player sellers: Add your entire pre-recorded reel collection to the box, please. Dear Cassette Player sellers: Leave your tapes in as long as they are (insert music type(s)).
It's been a while since I could shoot anything with the HiFi due to 'The Event' and not having the house to myself. I'm still very restricted by schedules though - coinciding available time with the right day takes a bit of juggling and if any reshoots are needed it can be a big problem.
Seeing the CD100 put a smile on my face: it was my first CD-player, bought used from a local shop in October 1984 for 2500 Dkr, with two of my then favourite albums (Dire Straits - Love Over Gold and Depeche Mode - Construction Time Again) thrown in. It played well and sounded great - loads better than my record player back then for sure, never mind my first tape deck. It took its sweet time reading the TOC though, and seeking wasn't much faster than winding a cassette with a finger, so I never programmed it. I passed it on to my sister at some point, wonder if she still has it. It would make for a fun repair/improvement project.
I never really considered the speed of operation of the very early machines, but now you've got me thinking about it.
I just got an ad for a very stylized CD players on Instagram. They know.
That's Facebook for you...sorry Meta. Fortunately I don't use their spyware, but Google still knows everything about me anyway.
Last time I bought a used car it came with a Britney Spears CD.
My commiserations.
Could it be a safety issue in an age where people became more litigious? A laser could possibly blind someone if they had no common sense and looked straight into it. Maybe there was a feeling amongst manufacturers that you needed to make sure no one could accidentally look into the laser.
It won't be that - the laser is below the disc and can only work with a disc in place and with the door shut. You can get a lot of cheap CD players nowadays with visible discs - based on an old Muji wall mounted design https://www.muji.com/in/products/cmdty/detail/4549738311720 so it doesn't seem to be an issue.
You're right Mat modern CD players are boring. Even the latest state of the art ones are. I have no idea why, perhaps the designers have never got their hands on legacy CD players like the Technics one you own.
Being a designer for anything must be a tough gig now when the public and the manufacturers want everything to look just like last years model as well as every other companies products too. It does seem that anytime someone tries something new the market pushes back, so companies stop experimenting.
Yes. Hadn't really thought of that. I tended to assume that the warning was a marketing thing as it bragged about the recording encompassing the full frequency range. Some record labels had it on all their discs well into the 90s but most didn't bother.
I'd have killed for one of those in 1986. I do remember thinking of front and top-loading players as cheap, possibly because the cheapest player on the market at the time was an old top-loading Toshiba. Also, the Amstrads and mass-market Philips players tended to be front-loading. Odd how the index points on CDs came to be forgotten as the years went on. Quite a lot of CDs had warnings that they could damage your equipment if played too loudly. I'm not sure if that happened very often.
I suppose there's the issue of a lack of hiss - so you could do a Marty McFly by turning it all the way up during a quiet part - without realising just how loud it was going to get.
Great video. I nearly bought an SL-P1200, but instead I recently got myself the CD player I always wanted when I was a kid in the 80’s - a Technics SL-P550, which whilst being a drawer load, has a mirror that shows you the disc rotating so you get that kinetic pleasure, but you can also get it to show a level meter on the display too! Sound is epic, the twin Burr-Brown DAC’s sound way nicer linked by analogue interconnect than the coaxial digital connection. Like I’m reliving my youth again!
Now is definitely the best time to get a CD player you once wanted but couldn't afford.
My parents bought an SL-P420 with the same prism when I was young (7, 8?). It was the first time we’d had anything remotely cutting-edge, and must have been a real stretch - for years after it was connected to a Sony TA-1010 amp that looked like it was from another century. I remember they even bought a handful of CDs before they got the player itself, including one of the 1812 Overture, which had a warning that the ‘digital cannon’ could damage your speakers if you played it too loud. It was a really prominent part of my childhood, and the beautiful design was a big part of that.
Getting your first CD player was really an exciting moment - I wonder if there'll be anything quite as revolutionary and mass-market introduced in the future. Perhaps everyone will be queuing up to get their AR goggles soon.
Now I need one of these that plays CDrs.
Some trivia ... it looks like your SL-P1200 has the same feet as a SL-1200/1210MK2.
They're a great design too - dampened and adjustable.
Fantastic episode! I’ve never been more fascinated by a CD player before.
Looking at the B&O players and the pageantry has vanished, they make movie players that sometimes play cds now.
I very nearly got one of the B&O Beosound 9000s once. It still might happen one day. It's amusing though how they used to sell a set of discs with nice patterns to display in it because they knew that most CD designs are uninteresting text - and a lot of that must be down to the way that so many players hide the discs away that there was little point in decorating them.
That will go nice with your Technics SV-P100 !
That lives in a box. Bit of a shame but perhaps one day I'll have space for everything.
I've had two Technics players with prisms in them so the horizontal disc looks like it's playing vertically. They both look fantastic. This is the one I have now https://youtu.be/N-FbYCIXq1k and this is the one I used to have https://youtu.be/EvUXMJ8e-Gw . Adored the sl-p2 was absolutely gorgeous.
I've never seen one of the prism machines in person. Seems like a good solution.
Hi Mat. Just wondering: Have you considered re-introducing your spinning digital Techmoan logo in your videos? Why was it ever removed? It's the only real mistake you've made ever ;-) Anyway, looking forward to watching the video. Cheers, Kim
I've no plans to change that intro at the moment. The spinning logo can still be seen in the current intro briefly and is also at the end of the videos - so it's not gone yet.
