TripleCorder - The Directors Cut
Today you‘ve got to witness the evolution of a video - (and the gradual breakdown of a man who thought this video was finished last night).
Version 1 - https://youtu.be/LMssgzVu4VU
The most interesting section of this first edition relied upon on something that unfortunately turned out just to be a misunderstanding.
Version 2 - https://youtu.be/Hz3g56qF5VE
In an attempt to remove some egg from my face - I did a re-edit that removed the nonsense sections, but unfortunately this resulted in the video as a whole becoming much less engaging and a bit flat.
Version 3 - The Directors cut (above)
This version adds back in the level of intrigue and confusion that was present in the original edition and takes it up a notch. This should hopefully be more fun for any viewers who (like me) didn’t know the secret behind the patent dates - but it also doesn’t end up misleading the viewer at the end.
I now know how George Lucas must feel - but this really is the final time I’m messing with this one...honest.
Comments (68)
Brilliant! Where do you get all those old magazines and brochures from? You always seem to have exactly the right one handy when you need them to prove your point.
I was on youtube reading the comments about this.. (Yes, i know, too much free time!!) But now i´m getting depressed.How about the idea of closing the comment section on your videos? ;)
There’s always less than 1% leave a comment and 99% of them are nonsense. So there really isn’t much point in them, however if you turn them off, everyone goes insane. So better to leave them switched on and ignore them.
Good one Matt. Appreciate the edits!
Good one - I am always surprised there is still so much more odd tech to discover. Loved the Shaggy Dog story. Missing the puppets..
Yeah this was fun, really enjoy the engineering and ideas behind these devices. I liked the elastic band trick (wonder if glueing a band round the circumference of the shaved down roller could bring it to the right size and alleviate the speed issue). I used to glue elastic bands round the paper rollers on laserjets that were not feeding anymore but otherwise serviceable. Paper used to polish the rubber roller smoother than a billiard ball over time. Back when laserjets were £1500...
I tried the band as well (off camera) and it reduced the speed a fraction but increased irregularities - I don't think the band was an equal thickness all the way around. However I think I'd need another three bands thickness to bring the speed back to where it should be.
Wow, what a wild exploration of history at the end there, had no idea the Japanese patent system used dates like that. Awesome video.
As always, I really love the fact hunt. So satisfying watching you dive into research like this!
Thanks for the journey, Mat! Great final product.
Great video as always. I really liked the date speculation because it wasn't just a throwaway joke but an actual analysis of the history of sound recording technology. Just for fun, I think I may have another reason why this couldn't be a 30s design: It appears that some people were unhappy with the high surface noise of shellac records as early as the 30s and vinyl records were already used for some professional applications. BUT, neither the 33,3 nor the 45 rpm speeds were agreed upon at this time and the records were not microgroove records like "modern" vinyl records. This means they couldn't be played back by a modern phono cartridge without massive mistracking due to the stylus tip being much too small for the groove. A 1930s designer would have needed to have truly prophetic abilities to be able to predict that microgroove and 45 rpm would become one of the dominant formats along with the competing 33,3 rpm LP :-) So, clearly, there must be time shenanigans and possibly interdimensional portals involved. The space aliens, flat earth society and the wig of Donald Trump seem to think they have covered it up fairly well. They're not fooling me, though. My Casio watch never showed me any weird "emperor years". I have to put on my tinfoil hat and research this further...
Nice video Mat, and nice piece of kit!! I suspect that the spindle you refer to as the capstan is actually the motor drive shaft - a capstan usually has a heavy flywheel on it to help regulate the speed and is indirect contact with the tape. Which raisers another interesting point.. from the brief glimpse under the tape head cover, there doesn't appear to be a capstan on this machine. This means that the linear tape will increase as the take-up spool fills up, since that spool is also the photograph platter and must be running at a constant rpm. I suppose it doesn't matter, since the machine only takes one size of spool and the speed change will be similar on record and playback... The change in tape speed could affect the frequency response tho..
I've just spent the last couple of hours expunging any reference to capstan and took the opportunity to reword a couple of other things that had bugged me in the earlier versions. Believe it or not - it's up to version 8.0 now and each one takes about 3 hours to upload. I've never spent as long on a video that so few people will see...it's very niche (and overlong).
So, no time travel patent scam, then. Darn, just an interesting bit of 60's design.
Now, had they called it a tricorder, that would have been 25th century tech
I really liked how it turned out as the patent date would definitely have thrown me off until I remembered that official Japanese documents always go off Emperor years. Good stuff overall.
The Directors Cut lol Matt you are cheating!! Love you for that!
the effect of the wow and flutter is awesome. It has that wet gargled acid sound that would work great for a zombie or ghost or supernatural being... LOVE IT. break that thing out for halloween man! really get yer MOAN in TechMoan
ThE wOw AnD fLuTtEr On ThIs ThInG iS tErRiBlE! :-)
I think if you took away the wow and flutter there wouldn’t be anything left.
Something I didn't see mentioned in either of the two earlier cuts (I'm saving the Director's Cut for last ;) ) - the reason for the tape running backwards and all! Notice the two functions are inextricably linked - the record and tape players? The tape is a RIM DRIVE! That's the only way to get the tape and turntable functions in the same drive mechanism. So the recordings couldn't be played in anything else - only this recorder and these tapes would reproduce exactly the right tape travel speed to more-or-less approximately recreate what was recorded onto them. Now stew on that :) edit: ahh, it was tucked into another comment earlier. OK, so I'm not the first. :)
Would that today's so-called journalists were as skilled at digging out accurate facts as you are, Matt. The Answer has a certain charm about it, thanks to the unique and quirky design. About as impractical as a Nixie clock, but equally pleasant to look at. Thanks for sharing this device!
Great video as always Matt!!! I'm not sure if anybody told you already, but you got the date wrong. 37 is not 1937, 37 is the thirtyseventh year of the showa era. That means 37 is 1962 in Gregorian calender.
Mat did his homework about Japanese time periods. You just need to watch the video until the end ;-)
I really enjoyed watching the progression through the three videos. Thanks for this peak behind the curtain!
Thanks for being so understanding. In a couple of hours another edit to the existing video on youtube should go live - I've deleted the timeline page as it dragged on a bit too long and slowed things down too much.
The capacitor replacement thing is a bit of a myth. While it is true that old electrolytic capacitors may go bad, many of them are actually fine. If you are concerned about them having gone bad, you can measure their capacitance and ESR (equivalent series resistance) and replace them if bad. On the other hand, if you have removed them for testing you could just replace them. However that means the device is no longer original. Also, electrolytics that have lost capacitance can often be rescued by reforming them carefully, i e applying a DC voltage over a number of hours, increasing in stages from a low voltage up to the working voltage. But often enough, just run the device and if problems appear which can be traced to a particular capacitor, then replace that one. Shotgun replacement of all electrolytics is unnecessary and is really mainly just religion and not based on fact. If you are interested in the subject, search the classiccmp mailing list for "recapping".
Thanks - its a subject I should really understand better. I've looked at capacitors in the past and whenever I think I've decoded the ratings into something that I could buy - the ones I've looked at appear totally different to the originals and I wonder if they are interchangeable or whether the physical size/shape is of any relevance.
It's better to release the final version of course, but we patrons appreciate the fun of watching the evolution of the piece! :-) By the way, not having a capstan, and being rim driven, the tape speed would have increased as the reel filled up, so replay on anything else would be nonsensical anyway.
I’m happy to share the mistakes on here, but I do hope the next video goes a bit smoother.
OK - Version 3 is now up. The new stuff starts just after the 20 minute mark.
The science fiction enthusiast in me prefers version 1. The historian in me prefers version 2. The compromise made in version 3 suits all of me.
Mat . . . . . . Since the transistor wasn't invented until 1947, I don't see how someone could conceive something that obviously used transistors before they were invented. The transistor first appeared in production in 1954. A radio (with only 4 transistors) was put on the market by Texas Instruments in late 1954. It was a piece of crap! Raytheon added a 4-inch speaker and 4 more transistors and had basically, the first transistor radio. I found all this on Wikipedia. There is a wealth of stuff there! Thanks for the fun and interesting video! . . . . . Dave
It was a design patent rather than a technology one - so in theory a chap in 1850 could have drawn a CD player - he didn’t need to stick to using steam power in it. You’ll see in version 3 of the video how I’ll weave this nonsense into a more coheavive narrative....coming soon.
This is great, I vote for a third version where that tape/technology timeline portion (BBC flat metal reel to reel...) is used.
That’s exactly the version I’ve just finished editing - uploading again soon.
Very neat device. However, I have to say the construction doesn't appear to be very good. I mean, I think if this thing were actually to be put into heavy use, it wouldn't last very long. There are certain things I noticed that just made me cringe. A big one was the design of how the stylus attached to the machine for playing records. Yeah, that wouldn't last long. So, beyond the issues you described that would probably prevent it from selling, I have a suspicion anyone who bought one probably didn't get a lot of use out of it.
This case is amazing. It looks like the case that my mom had her 'fall/hairpiece/partial wig' in.
Lovely video, even moreso finding out that the resolution was helped along by Patrons :)
I thoroughly enjoyed the original video as well. Having some of the earliest recorders in my collection I was wondering where you’d end up. Not to mention the 45 rom records not been invented yet. As far as the tape winding the wrong way, I’m not sure the tapes wouldn’t work on a conventional style recorder - if you imagine the Answer playing upside down from a conventional recorder as well. It’s all going to sound awful because it’s rim drive anyway.
I noticed another difference between this and a standard reel-to-reel mechanism that I think is worth mentioning — because there is no capstan driving the tape, the tape velocity varies as the spools wind, and they won't be compatible with standard reel-to-reel players which use a constant linear velocity (as measured in inches per second rather than RPM). Of course, if it worked the usual way, then it wouldn't be able to do the record-to-tape function on the same spindle.
I'd just noticed that too! By a quick calculation it'd range from about 11.5cm/sec to 18.75cm/sec depending on how far gone the reel was. An impressive piece of lateral thinking to think of running the tape at 45 constant RPM - once you've done that, adding record playback is relatively simple. Crazy device, but there's some method behind its madness. It's also maybe less outlandish to see unique tape formats like this when you look at it from the perspective of the 1960s. Most people didn't have a lot of tape recorders - if someone owned a tape recorder they would most likely own one, and all their recording and playback would be done on the same machine which makes format differences less relevant. It also adds a compelling sales pitch for models like this - when the customer walks into the shop and says "I'd like to buy one of those portable tape recorders", the salesman can say "Well, *this* model costs a little more but it also plays records and has a built-in radio". Only customers in the know would have been concerned about interoperability, and if they weren't concerned about it then it was easy to sell as a solution to multiple problems at once!
This was a very fun video. There are so many strange devices from the 50s through the 70s it would seem you'd never run out of things to demonstrate. The time travel aspect is a riot!
Please, please, please, keep some of the time travel stuff. It's immensely interesting. Kind of like, "Well, my first thought was, but then I realised..." etc.
I"m not sure how to - but I'll see if there is a way to work some of it back in. It was more fun, however I really don't like misleading people - it's a fine balance between spinning a yarn and looking like a buffoon.
The original version of this video is so much more fun. I loved your timeline analysis! I was lucky enough to see the original version before your updates and just happened to return here to comment only to find you'd already corrected it. Thanks for preserving the original for us.
Yes it's a shame to have to cut all the timeline stuff - but it just didn't make any sense when the truth behind the dates was revealed.
Don’t believe any of this “different calendar system” rubbish. That’s obviously just the time travelers wanting to confuse you.
Hey, really liked this :) Thank you Mat
Really enjoyed this - but the other flashback moment was when you compared 3” tape reels. The grey plastic one isn’t for tape... it’s actually designed for 8mm film (to a lesser extent, labs loaded Super 8 film onto them). It took 100ft of film, and unlike tape spools, the cine ones had a bevel in the slit to hold it in place. I’ve still got loads of them - but I doubt the Scotch box shown would have had tape using that actual spool!
I do have another one of those and it's on an identically shaped reel (same cut-outs and markings)- although clear and with no Kodak branding.
Today, I have been mostly entertained AND educated! I never knew the Japanese had an alternate calender system. Thanks Mat and all who clarified the date issue. very day is a school day.
It's not that great a mystery why the tape runs in the opposite direction. The record, after all, must run in clockwise fashion. Hence, the tape must run in clockwise fashion as well. The only other way they could have done it is by putting the tape player's head on the top of the machine, which is weird as well, and perhaps they didn't have space because of the batteries. Still, it's a peculiar device.
Funnily enough if someone followed normal tape logic (but not the instructions) - they'd mistakenly connect it up with the record on the right hand reel - as you can see in the pictures on this website. <a href="https://www.radiomuseum.org/r/unknown_answer_three_purposes_radio_phono_tape_atr_102.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.radiomuseum.org/r/unknown_answer_three_purposes_radio_phono_tape_atr_102.html</a>
Also, I'm impressed with your analysis of the all-metal design decision as a clue to design timeframe. Even if it is more recent, this seems like something only someone like you would really know.
The comments about the Imperial date system make all sorts of sense, but it reminds me very much about thus interview. <a href="https://youtu.be/D1vQ_cB0f4w" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/D1vQ_cB0f4w</a> The idea of someone seeing that far forward into the future is not impossible.
Love oddball things like this!
The video is quite entertaining even without the date speculation. But you're right that it looks like an older device.
Not really, it actually screams 60s. Check out old tape machines from the 30s, those look positively ancient ;-)
I knew somebody would solve that mystery. I still like the time travel explanation more....
So did I - I've had to keep a mention of time travel in the re-edit, because I didn't want to let it go entirely.
I’ve learned something new today, thank you. The better side of the www, far from twitter and YT comments.
I feel that I can make mistakes here amongst friends and take off any rough edges before everyone else gets to see it.
I figured that there must be something wrong with it - it just seemed too bizarre. Ok time to completely re-work this one then.
<a href="http://en.calc-site.com/calendars/ad_conversion" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://en.calc-site.com/calendars/ad_conversion</a> indicates Japanese Showa Calendar 37 equals 1961, which would make sense..
Thanks for the link - I'll be using that page in the re-edit.
The dates in the patent use the imperial date system. So it's Showa 39, or 1964, rather than 1939. Sorry to burst your bubble! Here's a link to a conversion chart. The eras correspond to the reigns of the emperors. <a href="http://seinenkai.com/articles/dates.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://seinenkai.com/articles/dates.html</a>
I'm glad you chaps are here - I knew there was something wrong, but just couldn't see the wood for the trees when I got deep into editing mode.
