💦 CREATE AND FUCK YOUR OWN AI CUMSLUT 🔥 TRY NOW ♥
Create AI Cumsluts 💦
July 5, 2025

Radio War Nerd EP #534 — Stalin's Officer Purges & Decapitation Strikes, feat. Annibale

Guest: Annibale
Recorded: July 3, 2025

Annibale returns to RWN to weigh in on the effect of Stalin's purges of the Soviet senior officer command on the USSR's military capabilities and its early disastrous response to Operation Barbarossa. We ask if "decapitation strikes" really work as advertised, and along the way, we rate mammals vs dinosaurs.

Books mentioned:
-Russia's War, by Richard Overy
-The Labyrinth : Memoirs of Walter Schellenberg, Hitler's Chief of Counterintelligence

More listening on WWII:
-Annibale's Battle of Kursk series
-Annibale's Operation Bagration series
-Annibale's Italy on the Eastern Front series

Total time: 1:20:34
Direct link to this episode's mp3 here

*

Subscribe to Radio War Nerd at patreon.com/radiowarnerd

Sound production by Telescope Audio

Check out the Radio War Nerd Merch store here!

Order your print or ebook of John Dolan's new book Erdogan Pizza: Dispatches from a Violent & Grotesque World

Comments (37)

C
Cameron Young · July 14, 2025

Mammals and others had to survive a couple centuries of being buried under volcanic ash. Dinosaurs had to easy. Those first 150 million years - those are Micky mouse eons. Talk to me when you survived a century of ash.

A
Annibale · July 14, 2025

Permian was generally super badass, but its end (and the Triassic's first couple of million years) were absolute hell on Earth; the closest Earth came to becoming another Venus. Only small things that could dig underground and hardy things that could swim very deep into the sea did survive. "Surviving a century of ash" is quite an understatement.

A
Andrew Bauer · July 11, 2025

What Japanese video game was Annibale referencing?

✮
✮BRAIN SLURRY✮ · July 10, 2025

As a lifelong paleontology nerd, listening to these uncultivated vulgarians stumble their way through deep geological history gives me rare sense of satisfaction.

P
Patrick Link · July 10, 2025

Any good reads on the Western moves that fueled the Great Scare of ‘27?

A
Annibale · July 10, 2025

There's not much; it's well covered in Stephen Kotkin's first volume of his Stalin biography (but I disagree with some of his assumptions about Stalin's motives). Another good starting point is thi https://warwick.ac.uk/services/library/mrc/collections/digital/russia/arcos

a
a clash of purple · July 8, 2025

I really feel that the Polish-Soviet War was The Most Important War in all of human history. If the Soviets had been able to make it to Germany and help the revolution succeed there, and spark the chain of revolutions envisioned by Marx that would resolve the class war in a positive way, then the fate of humanity looks very different. Instead, thanks to the Poles, we live in this doomed capitalist hell world. So thanks a lot, Poland. I think all nation-states are bad, but you really are the worst country ever. Also thanks to Lenin and Trotsky for somehow losing a war against Poland, the worst country ever.

C
Connor Keeley · July 9, 2025

Alternatively, a successful drive into Poland provokes the much-feared all-Western alliance against the USSR in the 20s or 30s that might actually have succeeded where Barbarossa failed. Really hard to say I think, but the struggle for Germany was probably more momentous for the fate of global socialism in the 20th century.

C
Christian Carrillo · July 8, 2025

You guys do great content but by Zeus you really outdid yourselves this time. How did we end up discussing the evolution of mammals before going back to Tukhachesky. My goodness, you guys are absolutely amazing and, really, Annibale should be a constant presence in RWN. Wow!

D
Demented Avenger · July 7, 2025

All I keep thinking during this is that Walter Schellenberg was pretty likable in Seventeen Moments of Spring, and maybe that just wasn't so?

C
Christopher Small · July 7, 2025

To John's point, I remember watching a lecture about how George Marshall handled the US military at the outset of WWII. Basically the gist of it was that Marshall issued a lot of demotions to the existing staff of generals across the board, with the basic idea that the older ones would just retire and the competent ones would quickly work their way back up. It was a good lecture, and I'll just link it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxZWxxZ2JGE

Q
Quinn · July 6, 2025

Ofc Annibale is a synapsid appreciator, guy really never misses

J
JJ · July 6, 2025

Interestingly Schellenberg was portrayed in soviet cinema as a very intelligent spy chief in the mini series Seventeen moments of Springz

A
Annibale · July 7, 2025

I'm a regular watcher of Russian language TV, and one of the regular tropes of Soviet and post-Soviet TV war dramas is that German intelligence is always diabolically clever. You see zillions of successful infiltrations that are, of course, thwarted by the weekly brave Smersh / NKVD / GRU officer. The only difference between the Soviet and post Soviet era is that in the former the "brave Smersh officer of the week" was a staunch communist, in the latter he's just a patriot following orders (and the "traitor of the week" has his dad/brother/spouse etc shot in 1937/38). Which quite contrast with reality as we know it, as, for what we know, most of the people whose family suffered under the purges still fought the Nazis

R
Rod Miller · July 6, 2025

Stalin demonstrated the truth of the proverb "Just because you're clinically paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you."

D
Damnboooi · July 6, 2025

I’m not a Stalin stan but one thing about the purges I have yet to see many historians look at is its effectiveness when compared to France’s military structure. The French surrender was basically precipitated by the generals who handed the political leadership a fait accompli saying the war was lost, partially because they did not want France to face extreme destruction. While military defeat was still likely, the French could have still tried to pull back and fight in the interior, raising new troops and building new defence lines etc. However there was not the political will for an all out fight to the death against Hitler. Stalin was constantly worried about lingering tsarist influence in the military and that his generals might do a ‘patriotic’ coup against him. Although the purges reduced the immediate effectiveness of the military and had the terrible effect of making remaining officers overly passive, the USSR was able to absorb cataclysmic battlefield defeats without the structure falling apart (something the Nazis counted on to win, a la France). I think many western historians see political considerations as primarily interfering nuisances in issues of pure military professionalism. But the fact remains that France collapsed due to its defeatist leadership after suffering a terrible battlefield defeat while the USSR stayed in the fight despite suffering a multitude of like defeats. Perhaps the same would have happened without the purges but this does pose potentially uncomfortable conclusions. Perhaps the bloody purges were necessary to keep the army from capitulating, even if it meant accepting reduced battlefield effectiveness. Many western historians tend to paint excesses of totalitarian regimes as both cruel and ineffective, showing the inherent faults of totalitarianism. But what is even more disturbing is having to evaluate whether the psychopathic purges were essential in keeping the military leadership absolutely loyal to the vozhd. We don’t have any way to test counter factuals but I think more scholarship evaluating the cold hearted logic of the purges with specific comparison to the case of France would be interesting.

R
Rod Miller · July 6, 2025

The French had bled through a catastrophic war with Germany just two decades earlier. WWII French generals had been through it personally. Now they were facing the Imperial German Army with knobs on. Whereas the Russians knew they were up against a genocidal foe, that defeat meant extermination. Seems to me the Russians were 1000X more motivated.

J
John Waaben · July 6, 2025

Real man’s take: mammals are cuter but birds are prettier 💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪

L
Larry Dimes · July 6, 2025

I request, nay, demand a paleontology war nerd series.

J
Jack Ross · July 6, 2025

Thank you for standing up for the Dinos Mark

C
CR · July 7, 2025

They’re still big lizards to me, damn it!

A
Annibale · July 6, 2025

Re listening this right now and I've realized I keep making a huge mistake through the show, saying that the Soviet intelligence and repressive apparatus was still the Cheka. Of course this is not true, as the Cheka had been dissolved in 1922, and the bulk of the repression was carried on by NKVD. Apologies for the confusion!

T
The Squash · July 6, 2025

You heard my chanting ANIBALE!ANIBALE!ANIBALE!

G
Garibaldi · July 6, 2025

Comrade Tukhachecsky's 'confession' was splattered with his blood

Y
Yairo Martis · July 6, 2025

Another banger episode in the bag, boys.

j
james brown lover power peace · July 6, 2025

cool

N
NYCM&AHole · July 6, 2025

Sabertooth lizard

C
CR · July 6, 2025

It’s so odd to imagine JD in the heart of the beast

C
CR · July 6, 2025

I do think it was interesting for Anibale to end by saying that decapitation strikes don’t work when JD has made it quite clear that at least once it had a huge impact (Lincoln). And that’s probably why he has that impression about McClellan and Burnside, which is also probably accurate.

W
William · July 6, 2025

I don’t think you can categorically say that they don’t work; it would depend on the depth of leadership. Lincoln is such a leadership anomaly it’s not useful to compare to other situations

M
Muirneach · July 6, 2025

If John is staying about London...get down to The Yellow Bittern for some good Irish grub he will enjoy it...

W
William Brame · July 5, 2025

Annibale the most knowledgeable level headed gamer

Y
Yairo Martis · July 6, 2025

Which Japanese video game did he quote?

J
Jake Paterson · July 5, 2025

I adore this old Italian man

T
T · July 6, 2025

Anibale talks about prehistoric mammals the way most old Italian men talk about women in their 20’s

G
Garibaldi · July 5, 2025

Without having yet listened to the episode, I am curious how Stalin and Budyonny's joint failure in the Polish-Soviet War, and their mutual hatred of Tukhachevsky will be handled. Budyonny's incompetence and steadfast opposition to mechanization played a large role here to the best of my knowledge.

J
JJ · July 6, 2025

Kotkin ‘s new biography of Stalin argues that Stalin/Budyenny didn’t do anything really wrong strategically in the polish soviet war. Their troops were occupied with taking Lvov and could not have made it north to Warsaw in time to prevent the Soviet route. He blames primarily Lenin for pushing Tukhachevesky to over extend himself by going around Warsaw to link up with Germany.