THE TRUTH ABOUT THE 1769 KJV & BIBLES CLAIMING TO BE THE AUTHORIZED 1611 KJB
I'm not sure if I posted this in the past. However, Hillis and I were speaking at length regarding this subject, so I thought perhaps those who hadn't seen the video would benefit from it.
Comments (10)
The 1769 Firewall explanation, stopping most people from getting to the real 1611, nails it, it's truly sad, just imagine what Jeremiah was feeling as he is prophecying all this, thx Reg 🙏
Roy, thk you for this added insight into Blayney, great points, for his version of the KJV, to get such notariary & being an Episcopalian, that has definite ties to the Vatican. You couldn't make this insane deception up, if you tryed. Blayney, had no official Hebrew/ Greek training & his KJV was the most popular, sounds like an inside job to me. Jeremiah 23:36, one of many scriptures that nail this Jesuit influenced deception of the 1769 (revision) KJV Bible. Only by God's grace, did the Lord lead me to the 1st printing of the 1611 KJV 1st printing.
Thank You Reg for wrestling against the powers and principalities in high places. My best guess is that Blayney was one of three things. He may have been an initiated freemason as freemasonry was sweeping Europe at that time (see,e.g. Mozart's "the Magic Flute" which may have gotten him killed at age 33; also see, eg, many of the signers of the Declaration of Independence). At the very least, he would have been surrounded by them at Oxford. I think this is the highest probabillty as he was just entering his profession which is when freemasons target their members.
I agree. There's a lot more behind Blaney. He was a useful tool, little more.
(Edit- accidentally posted twice.) So continuing on above. The second possibility is that he was a Jesuit co-ajuter. Again, the Jesuits were still very active in England, especially after the Restoration and the Glorious Revolution. The final is that he was an adherent to Enlightenment thought, very big in University settings, which is really just consistent with the first two. The replacing of genders in the 1769 is consistent with freemasonry/baphomet/divine feminine religion. I also note the year it came out . . . 69. . . which is the yin-yan duality sign
The 1769 KJV is a brilliant work, designed to fulfill a specific purpose. It's the fire wall, stopping people from getting to the real McCoy, the 1611 AKJB. They've succeeded in convincing most people that the 1769 is the King James Bible and that it is a translation. So, the search is over. If someone comes to the realization that all modern Bibles are Fake, they still have to get past the 1769. Case in point, KJV-Onlyist think they've arrived, and convincing them otherwise is nigh impossible.
There is a bible app on android called, 1611 King James Bible Version (on app store, it will show a bible & on the bottom right corner, the page is folded up), that I have been using & in Galatians 2:19, 3/4 of the verse is missing. (Be aware) Does anyone know of a place, I can go, to get the 1611 KJV on audio, k thx 🙏
I don't think there is an audio version. I'm not sure how much benefit it would be, as when one reads the capitals, commas and spelling are not evident.
Thk you Reg, for your Blessed due diligence,
This is so necessary, thank you Reg!