💦 CREATE AND FUCK YOUR OWN AI CUMSLUT 🔥 TRY NOW ♥
Create AI Cumsluts 💦
How to Export Ban - transcript.pdf 30.6 KB
September 24, 2026

How To Ban Diesel Exports || Sept 24, 2026

A ban on American crude or diesel exports isn't going to improve energy security; if anything, it will reduce domestic production. The problem lies in geography.

Most U.S. production and refining is concentrated in places like Texas and Louisiana, which are quite far from the demand centers in California and the Northeast. So for crude, export bans would oversaturate producing regions and discourage drilling. For diesel, the bans are futile without expanding infrastructure and changing the transport systems.

Export bans only make sense if paired with major changes to accompany them.

Looking for something else?

The links below will take you to the Zeihan on Geopolitics YouTube page, each of our social media channels, info on how to purchase Peter Zeihan's books, our website, and more. Click the box to navigate to your desired page.

If there is still something else that you need, the helpful links tab below will direct you to anything you might need. This includes the Patreon support page, how to submit a question for Peter, and more.

Comments (46)

T
Twomix · October 7, 2026

Amending the Jones Act could fix a lot of America's distribution problems, but nobody will touch it because the special interests that own much of U.S. domestic shipping protect their own.

A
Awliya Kakar · October 1, 2026

Don't you think that US is on the way to compromise its unipolar world status....? As already found a decline in the NATO....

C
C C Black · October 1, 2026

Mr. Rocketman, Thank you for your reply. Sometimes the best way to “reach someone” is not to “tell them what to think” ….. but to ask them to answer “the question “ and let them realize the answer. Otherwise, there are people who can never be “reached”.

R
RocketMan · October 1, 2026

Woww, so much winning, I assume you're tired of winning already, but there's two more years of such winning 👏🏻

R
Rayna broncocutie · October 7, 2026

Hello dear

C
Crockett Dunn · September 29, 2026

Did I miss a part of the equation about storage? Seems like we were just talking about the strategic reserves being depleted. Crazy question : can we store a unrefined product and call it reserves?

g
geopunk · September 26, 2026

I’m confused. I thought the export ban was supposed to be international. Was Zeihan saying Trump wants to ban a piece of interstate commerce?

G
Gil Bernal · September 25, 2026

I sort of expected more of an economic discussion on this. If I understand things correctly (always questionable) the US refineries are able to refine more than enough diesel to supply the US market and still have sufficient capacity to export some to other countries. I thought that the high diesel prices we are seeing are purely market driven. Diesel supplies from Russia, middle east, and ??? (drawing a blank) are significantly reduced right now. That makes the US one of the few dependable suppliers right now. And so foreign demand is driving up prices. And it's not like the refiners are going to sell diesel at reduced prices in the US when they can get more $$$ selling it abroad. And so they charge essentially global rates in the US because they can. And that is driving the consideration to limit or ban exports of diesel. Seems as though banning exports of diesel would really screw over the rest of the world right now... hmmmm... planned?

P
Peter Stanton · September 25, 2026

Who says that crude or refined products like diesel have to have a complete ban on exporting. Trump could implement a partial restriction on diesel exports of say 25-33% and see what happens to domestic retail prices. There should be sufficient distribution capacity for this partial restriction on exports.

B
Bryce Labs · September 25, 2026

How are we distributing the diesel now? Why can’t that continue?

J
Jason Irby · September 25, 2026

Trump wants to ban diesel exports in order to pressure EU and East Asia into helping with opening the Strait. He doesn't care that will just make things worse for the rest of us. Come-on midterms.

x
xerootg · September 25, 2026

Thanks for covering this. Seems like we need to thread a needle to get out of this only majorly broken for a long time and the time to act is right was a looong time ago but now is second best and the person taking the reigns on this one is the trump administration.

R
Richard DeLotto · September 24, 2026

...I think you might be underestimating the political backlash "re-commercializing" inland waterways would bring. A coalition of angry Greens, recreational boaters, property owners with river views, property developers assembling or building waterfront high-ticket housing and urban parks & recreation departments would be interesting to watch.

S
Steven L Hess · September 24, 2026

Repeal the Jones Act. That by itself would have a huge positive impact on the US Economy.

E
Eric Smith · September 24, 2026

Why doesn't the U.S repeal the Jones act?

M
Melvin · September 24, 2026

It already has temporarily for crude and fuels. I think the latest extension goes on till Nov. 30th. It has been that way for months and the amount of fuels going through the Panama Canal has skyrocketed.

M
Melvin · September 24, 2026

I guess you guys don't do research anymore. 1) The Jones act for fuels and crude is suspended until November. 2) they are talking about a 90 day Diesel only ban on exports. Not a permanent one. 3) No one has said anything about banning crude exports. So yes they can easily transport the fuels by water. US fuel storage will get refilled before we start exporting again. We would create a buffer. And prices would drop in the short term for a bit. But even if they were to ban Crude and Diesel both for 90 days. We could just refill the reserves, that everyone keeps complaining about, during that time.

C
C C Black · September 24, 2026

Assuming you have a marine tanker ship available for transport from Houston to San Diego with a load of diesel, it takes about two days to load the ship and clear the transport documents, port, etc., it takes another 10 days to travel through the Canal and reach San Diego. So in two weeks you have moved only a million gallons of diesel. So T’s solution moves 9 loads in 90 days… assuming you can find US ships to take the loads. Oh, that makes sense only for people in DC and those MAGAs in Congress.

E
Edwin Pole II · September 24, 2026

Elsewhere I commented on the Jones Act. We have been processing our shale output by mixing it with Canadian and Venezuelan crude. Trump is "fixing" Venezuelan and he should pull his head outta his ass and keep that flowing. Short term refinery issue solved.

A
Allen M · September 24, 2026

Ok, we do have significant pipelines in America that move products. Arizona is supplied by the Gulf Coast. The biggest problem is the environment required formulas for fuel. See CARB gas in California and Maricopa County. Plus boutique diesel in CA. We have no problem with our internal distribution of products, we have a complicated system getting tremendous adverse external impact from the world market demand

J
Jason Irby · September 24, 2026

Just because it would be idiotic and counter-productive, doesn't mean Trumpstein won't do it.

K
Kowalski from Nebraska · September 24, 2026

This type of supply destruction would be like closing off another half of the volume getting out of the Persian gulf for the rest of the world. The United States exports like 1.5 million barrels of diesel fuel and the destruction of that much US production would also destroy a good chunk of our gasoline production. We should fully expect the Trump administration to do this, all the experts told Trump and Hegseth before starting the civilian butchering campaign in Iran that Iran would respond by closing the street and sending oil prices through the roof… Why would their mentality change now?

M
Myron Lewis · September 24, 2026

Good analysis thanks

M
Michael Van Aken · September 24, 2026

I don't understand how banning diesel exports causes internal US distribution problems. If it can get there now, why all of a sudden will it not be able to get there?

J
Jason Irby · September 24, 2026

The EXTRA diesel they hope to redirect to local markets instead of being shipped abroad needs a way to be distributed. Our current distribution ONLY handles so much because we are used to the rest going a different route overseas. We are not prepared to distribute the extra internally , when we stop shipping abroad. So it will stack up at production locations and (supply and demand) drop the price below what local producers are willing to drill for. Not to mention it is just flat-out Communist-like interference in the market.

D
Debbie789 · September 24, 2026

None of the solutions happen in a week do they? How long for diesel? A couple years?

H
HippoPigaMoose · September 24, 2026

That's funny: this discussion is directly related to one of my current strategies in the market...put options on unp, general dynamics, kirby corp, and going long on coastal refineries Phillips 66 and PBF, tank car manufacturers Trinity, Greenbrier, GATX, western corridors though BNSF, and marine midstream terminals enterprise and energy transfer. Most everything is decent value, this is not financial advice.

C
C C Black · September 24, 2026

As one of my professors one said: “Sometimes you have to go out on the balcony and take a long look”. So….. Has the Trump administration and the Republican Congress done anything good for America?

R
RocketMan · October 1, 2026

Really? You think any of those care about something abstract like "America"

T
Thomas · September 24, 2026

Use dpa and congress to set a minimum domestic refined supply of diesel of 4 million barrels per day at reasonable markup of whatever is decided. That still leaves 1.5 million barrels of refined diesel and similar distillates to be exported at extremely high prices. The United States should be moving towards a bifurcated energy market. One price for U.S. and one for everyone else. We already get below market prices for Canadian and Venezuelan crude to blend with our light sweet. Energy is the lifeblood of any industrial economy and cheaper energy means more U.S. development.

P
Paul R. Anderson · September 24, 2026

Colonial piple moves at 5 mph Its like walking speed

P
Paul R. Anderson · September 24, 2026

Do not ban exports. Tax diesel exports and use the proceeds to build refineries.

M
Melvin · September 24, 2026

It's against US law to tax exports.

m
maverick · September 24, 2026

What areas of the world refine (US) light crude? Are they close to areas that produce heavy crude? Wouldn't the investment in a time shift for refiners around the world make more sense?

N
NeilJT · September 24, 2026

For every (human) problem there is a solution that is simple, obvious and wrong...

m
maverick · September 24, 2026

If the Jones Act were repealed, how and why would shipping change? What infrastructure would have to change, and how?

P
Paul R. Anderson · September 24, 2026

We can load tankers in the gulf and sail them to California and the North East

M
Mark Dixon · September 24, 2026

I can imagine Trump falling asleep halfway through this short video explainer...

B
Bibity bop · September 24, 2026

So you’re saying the prices in Texas would go down if I did this? Perfect!

B
B Dub · September 24, 2026

Stupid is as stupid does seems to be this administration’s guiding principle

R
RJ · September 24, 2026

Peter said in the video that the administration knows what theyre doing when it comes to this

A
Armor Fair · September 24, 2026

Thanks Peter, didn't see that explanation coming. Live and learn.

D
David Hixson · September 24, 2026

While it would make us more isolationist, having our advanced refineries switch from dirty crude to clean would mean that the rest of the world would now have more dirty crude they didn't have a way to process. If we need more enemies this seems like a very expensive way to create some. Alternatively, perhaps we could not destroy another chunk of the global energy system.

F
Freebeard · September 24, 2026

Thankfully, it's not just a switch you can easily flip and change over to. It took a large investment of time and money to retool our refineries. It would be just as, if not more, costly to go back; and I just don't see how anything less than the federal government seizing ownership of the refineries to compel that kind of action.

E
Edwin Pole II · September 24, 2026

Repeal the Jones Act which is NOT something that Trump did. Nor did he set up most of the underlying issues we have. It is inarguable that he's a fool and a bull in a china shop but he didn't CREATE most of our underlying issues.

G
GasMan · September 24, 2026

Except for the little issue of bombing Iran and closing the Straight of Hormuz. Which is why this is even an issue.