atomic bomb live version :eyes:

I came here to first and foremost say thank you for putting so much effort into the full systematic breakdown , not only in your last vid, but throughout them all. Secondly I'd like to request a topic inspired by the Lions led by Donkeys podcast. The Wehrmacht and /or operation unthinkable. When I heard about these subject I was was shocked into stunned silence similar to how I felt about your most recent video. Please consider covering this/these in the future, and defiantly listen to that podcast as well. Happy 2021, you're amazing.

A stealth PragerU response is any video dealing with reality.

Me too.

Regarding the so-called "Patriarchy Paradox" used as the title of the lecture, it was founded on some pretty shaky grounds. From what I can see, in its labeling of individual countries as progressive or traditional on gender issues, it pretty much just looked at on-the-books laws and other surface-level markers of progressivism, while completely failing to take into account historical and deeply rooted cultural factors that can influence the socialization of children into certain gender roles. For instance, most would regard the Nordic countries as progressive in regards to social issues, but many people don't realize that many of those countries were very late to the women's rights movement, and in fact, women in Switzerland only received the right to vote in the Federal election in 1971. So to do a bs, surface-level analysis, and when your results from that analysis seem contradictory and paradoxical, to, instead of considering that maybe you made a methodological error or two at some point, argue that you've in fact uncovered some new paradox that shows that when you try to remove people from their true, biologically ingrained nature by "inforcing equality" it causes people to "bounce back" and adhere more closely to classical gender roles is, worth questioning, I would say. I would also consider looking at the authors of the study with a more critical eye for so hastily jumping to that conclusion. Now, I would not be so bold as to assume that the results are certainly incorrect, only that the study was not well conducted, and that it should be reattempted with improved methodology. But, if we're being honest, what's more likely, the freaking Patriarchy Paradox, or that they screwed up and needed to look more closely at the cultures of the countries included in the study to get a better sense of historical gender norms in those countries before giving them a progressiveness score?

I'll 2nd this request!