1982 SAT Circle Paradox - didn't know it was a thing..

I thought 1982 SAT Circle Paradox is a joke/troll topic, i still can't believe people don't understand this simple concept, i can easily visualize it in my head and know that answer is 4, assuming ring sizes are 1:3 ratio. See the illustration below:

i literally thought the following is common sense:

NOTE: circles and lines are 1:1 sizes. A is really 3x shorter than B, i specifically measured it in photoshop, pixel to pixel.

YES, i made this entire image in photoshop without help of AI, cuz AI got it wrong. i mean AI understood the logic behind it, but couldn't draw it. and to go into detail, freely available AIs don't directly generate images, they have access to image generator tool and they only send prompts to image generator, so it's fault of image generator, not fault of IA.

anyway i just made quick illustration in photoshop to show how i see it in my head.

I take those circles apart into lines and then "roll" A over B and count the distance. i have NEVER heard anyone explain it this way, but i thought everyone does it same way, til i realized that i seem to be only one who can visualize it in this way.