曼城紅牌

曼城馬蛇算唔算新行運光頭? 紅左Foden仲好踢 , 曼聯2次中柱 + offside贏波

我覺得個越位問題令曼聯轉移咗focus, 踢多個都踢唔出優勢先係問題

請問何蛇， 1) 曼城踢咗幾場，依家佢地係擅長邊啲戰術？a)高位壓迫、b)控腳在腳、c)收縮反擊 2) 曼聯呢，依家佢地係擅長邊啲戰術？a)高位壓迫、b)控腳在腳、c)收縮反擊 我見曼城面對密集其實麻麻地，最好對手肯對攻，曼城對守轉換都唔錯，壓迫力曼城都好一般 曼聯，好似乜都差咁，中場唔夠運轉力，對攻唔係好著數，但曼聯面對密集仲衰過對攻，對攻都話有得入下波，搏下得球多過失球；曼聯面對密集連角球都刷唔起。其實般奴咁鐘意壓前，大戰應該學坦光頭咁，搵佢踢假9，出少個進攻點，可惜卡域克冇接受呢個足球遺產。最後，曼聯高位壓迫都唔掂，壓迫唔夠整體又冇高速回防能力，收縮又驚高波。都係個句，曼聯好似踢對攻最舒服。 何蛇點睇

曼城又因球証/VAR嘅犯錯成功偷到3分。 Pro Ref have issued the following statement: “Following the incident in the 60th minute of Sunday's Premier League fixture between Manchester United and Manchester City at Old Trafford, we can provide clarification regarding Erling Haaland’s awarded goal. “The on-field decision was offside against Erling Haaland – that was checked by VAR and he was found to be in an onside position. “In the same attack, it was established that Enzo Fernandez did not play the ball and therefore that makes any offside offence subjective, however, on this occasion, the VAR did not recognise the likely impact of his position and should have recommended an on-field review. “Contact has been made with Manchester United this evening to acknowledge what we deem is an error of judgement. A review of the incident will take place.”

依家先講就變馬後炮 但踢到半場時, 我同朋友講 曼城個紅牌曼係踢走進攻終結者Foden, 加埋曼城會多咗收縮, 成件事都對曼聯冇著數 依家曼聯只可以靠啲鴨仔波/頭鎚追和. 如果FODEN冇走, 夏蘭特入球個刻就唔會企咁右, 而企右邊既FODEN就唔會把握到個入球, 個紅牌算係救咗馬利茲卡. 其實我係唔同意大戰出CHERKI正選的