💦 CREATE AND FUCK YOUR OWN AI CUMSLUT 🔥 TRY NOW ♥
Create AI Cumsluts 💦
December 28, 2025

Opt-Out Attack

I wanted to make a longer video about this, but my attorneys don't think releasing a big video that is in a gray area with the FAA is a good idea. 🫠
So bookmark that, but in the meantime, here's a quick and very limited rundown.

Comments (55)

j
john · May 29, 2026

Oh how I would love to make one of these devices. There's someone in my neighborhood I sincerely hope it's a child and not a creepy old dude who flies his drone around looking at windows and hovers over my backyard sometimes. He generally leaves when I pull out my cell phone and make it look like I'm calling someone about him. Please basically told me there's nothing they can do unless I can point them to a house. They said call the FAA who's not going to do anything. I wish you could make this open source

O
Ollie · May 24, 2026

So funny I was literally think about looking in this sort of targeted anti-drone defense. I was thinking about RF jamming but I think this is also a legal no-no :)

A
Andrew Seubert · March 25, 2026

seems like I should be able to do some of this with my HackRF - any advice where to start?

G
Grsshppr · February 9, 2026

Could come in handy against those drones the police send up to scan for all our mobile phone ID's during protests. It could also interfere with friendly drones though, like the ones the protest organizers might want to use to get a head count so they can report it accurately. -- Or just to get a cool shot they can post on social media.

J
Jim S. · February 10, 2026

Boy you are like simp of the century aren't you? Ahhheemmmm the pwotesto's might neeed an akurate head count to report. Who the fuck exactly would the protesters need to report an accurate head count to? George Soros? The department of the latest fake gay protest?

Z
Zen Chillin · January 19, 2026

I need one of those

J
Jim Ji · January 15, 2026

Really looking forward to learning more!

D
Deborah Wells · January 9, 2026

Saw the YT short, thank you!

D
Deborah Wells · January 9, 2026

Do you or others have any good ideas with respect to this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HUD9atKkUo

W
William · January 8, 2026

Sent a message on insta today - I figured you had attorneys but it is good to see confirmation of that.

L
L · January 5, 2026

I know you've said you're looking for legitimate needs/use-cases for these in North America and I'll state one. Let me preface this saying I'm a pilot, and no not a drone "pilot", a private pilot. So with that comes an understanding of the FAA's airspace regulations and rules that goes deeper and is more informed than people who are not. So, right now you can find countless examples of people using consumer drones to harass and film their neighbors from directly over their property. It's usually stories on "legal" advice subreddits asking what can they legally do to a neighbor who is harassing them or taking pictures or video with their drone of backyard activities or even in house activities. Because you don't own airspace over your property, there usually isn't anything you can do that immediately solves this because most tactics involve damaging the drone, which is illegal. It bothers me on such a deep level that it's illegal for someone to just use a shotgun and bird shot and blast some pervert's drone out of the sky (you know, so long as you're birdshot won't come back down and hurt someone). Instead people are forced to file complaints or call local cops, and well, as we know...that is a slow process and not always effective. This tool would allow people to simply scramble the video signal of their asshole neighbor or ne'er-do-well. Simple as that. I don't DIY as well as I used to, so I doubt I'd be able to make one, but it's a great idea and should be disseminated before it's regulated.

J
Jimbo · February 18, 2026

Does it scramble the the actual recorded video, or only the video being sent back to the handset via radio waves? If it is just the video back to the handset, the video on the SD card on the drone could still be used to annoy and harass :( Oh, and I too am bothered on a deep level that I can't remove a problematic drone over my property.

F
Forrest Miller · January 5, 2026

You are literally influencing legislation now. You've entered a very select group of public tech researchers. Congrats and condolences are in order, I think.

C
Caroline · January 5, 2026

Benn, there might be a new arms race toy for you to play with. Quantum sensors. Supposedly they can prevent GPS spoofing by using INS (inertial navigation systems). I’m not sure what all is involved, but infleqtion has few products. It could be worth looking into. They also have radio tech and time keeping stuff with interesting antenna claims. It’s all too technical for me to understand but yeah.. I am so here for the rebel kick. PLEASE never hesitate to start a gofundme or whatever for any legal fees you incur outside of any insurance or operating expenses from your channel. On that note, I wish more of you cerebrally minded content creators would start funds for academic grants they’re passionate about. You’re my favorite YouTuber to share FYI. We’re in your corner 😊

P
Patrick Deuley · January 6, 2026

My company makes some quantum sensors and can confirm that they can prevent GPS spoofing in various ways. Inertial navigation is one approach, another is using gravity maps!

r
rob burbank · December 31, 2025

I'm still trying to figure out how to print out that L plate sticker on my own

J
John Clark · December 31, 2025

Legal or not, I want one!

T
Tekrytor · December 29, 2025

Herewith, the answer to my previous question to Benn about how to stay motivated as a creator in these dystopian times. Create exactly what's needed. Big attaboy at Benn!

M
Marty Schrader · December 29, 2025

I wish to retain the 12 gauge option for dealing with intrusive drones. Birdshot is a wonderful means of [cough] "disrupting" antagonistic devices. Nonetheless, more research into targeted electronic signal disruption is always welcome. It is, in fact, cat and mouse. In this case, it's closer to armor and warhead.

J
Justin · December 29, 2025

Does the device disrupt other recording devices? Phones is the obvious example but I'm mostly curious about the new Ray-Ban Meta sunglasses.

F
FaeTheWolf · December 29, 2025

From what I saw, it looks like the jammer can only only operate on RF signal packets, such as those used by drones to stream video to the controller (or GPS timing packets used to triangulate location). It could be used to limit a phone's ability to upload video, but local on-device recording would almost certainly be unimpeded.

P
Passenger · December 29, 2025

Nice prototype. I guess it might have some merit within Kherson region where people are targeted by fpv-type drones. Although they’re highly modified and models vary. I guess in current state it won’t help against “скид” (down throw attack?) but it is only a prototype. Currently, many civilians are using “Чуйка” (chujka) device to locate nearby signals and when it’s close enough you can see a video from drone. It allows you to hide from it or to evade the attack if you in the car.

R
Robert Coli · December 29, 2025

the exasperated cyberpunk sigh at the end

K
Karamba Spy · December 29, 2025

What if you had a bumper sticker that only resembles a license plate? Would the AI model attempt to read it? If so, AI poisoning could be used on it. The original license plate would then be legible, but the poisoning would eventually cause the model to stop functioning properly? In such a situation, would a court deem such cameras unreliable and ban their use by law enforcement?

J
Jan-Willem Markus · December 29, 2025

There are anecdotes from truck drivers in the EU that it helps to have a novelty license plate with the name of the truck or your loved ones. Novelty, as in not a real plate, we don't really do vanity plates. I expect this doesn't work as well anymore, but I can be made to believe it worked well on early ANPR systems.

B
Brian Maneely · December 29, 2025

I wish you could main-channel this one, but solid move keeping it less accessible.

D
DarkSkyGhost · December 29, 2025

Currently in Ukraine, unfortunately, drones mostly are no longer operated with radio but with optical wire :/

F
FaeTheWolf · December 29, 2025

This is my first time learning of this. Apparently some drones have had up to 50km of optical fiber 🫣 that is an incredible invention, and must be terribly hard to deal with!

C
Carl Schweppe · December 29, 2025

That’s sick tech. Raytheon had some similar platforms. what’s the range? The samples in the video are wayyyyy inside the pitbul or is dead stick and relying on the payload splash.

a
adfaklsdjf · December 29, 2025

okay, what am i bookmarking?

C
Connor Dean · December 29, 2025

i think he was using those words to mean a more general, "we'll come back to that," rather than as a directive or call to action or some sort. Like how someone might say, "let's put a pin in that one," and then not violently jab pins into it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ unless that person is a sadist, i guess... lol.,

S
StoryGirlOz · December 29, 2025

One wonders if it might be possible to simply trigger the return to base response. Probably easy enough to do with commercial drones using the same chipset. Probably harder with bespoke/hardened drones built for security forces. Also - have you been playing Watch Dogs recently? ;)

B
Benn Jordan · December 29, 2025

You can definitely send a RTH command with spoofing. It is also probably more illegal than this (at time of writing).

G
Gabor Kukucska · December 29, 2025

The opt-out is briliant as it is still safe to use. On a related note, effective personal protection against drones or any other potentially harmful robotics will also pretty fast become a necessity so I hope these devices will get legislated and allowed with caviats or safety before it is too late!

F
Fynn · December 29, 2025

Another reason why i'm happy to live in germany. You're only allowed to transmit 25mW at 5,8ghz in the EU instead of 1W in the US. (Data from ChatGPT)

G
Gabor Kukucska · December 29, 2025

OMG I love this, I have been constantly thinking about drone defence since I had my first dji 😅 thry're just too good to feel safe in the same universe they exist 😃 I hope that there are people with required skills to build such devices to protect their people in ANY war zone 🙏

J
Jim Crandall · December 28, 2025

Interesting concept. I'll be interested to hear were this goes...

O
Ozlem Polat · December 28, 2025

I have been dreaming about something like this for so long. I cannot believe Benn just dropped the proof of concept. Thank you for all you do to protect our freedom.

T
Theodore Omtzigt · December 28, 2025

This is tricky: if you can't open-source the implementation and instead can only hint at the solution, then only well-resourced organizations will be able to act on the information. Those are precisely the organizations that tend to have a stake in mass surveillance, so the potential solution to increase citizen privacy is going to be circumvented before it can reach mass market. And indeed it is going to be very difficult to apply this technology in a legal way when all the different use cased from police, ICE, military, media is using the same technology path as the use cases for fire, search & rescue, recovery, discovery, etc. As a citizen, you have no idea who is trying to surveil you, and whether it is for your benefit or detriment.

T
Tokkan FX · December 28, 2025

If only there was an orphaned github account with some instructions and code....

J
Jake D · December 28, 2025

Or, perhaps a repo hosted by a Canadian or a citizen of other country not yet invested in this type of technology?

A
Amelia Lewis · December 28, 2025

Thanks, Benn! By demonstrating that it's possible, you've made it possible for others to replicate. At least until some legislator tries to pass a law making interference with state surveillance devices a crime (which I would've thought would be the kiss of death for a political career, at one time, but hey, we've all been young and naive).

S
Steve · December 28, 2025

I flip off every Flock camera I see and have wished for a forceful and non-destructive enforcement of my rights and freedom.

C
C · December 29, 2025

My wife said they have a record of my pointing at every single one I pass lol

P
Peter Gravelle · December 28, 2025

FCC might also not approve

M
Moz in Oz · December 28, 2025

I think the FCC will very not approve. Without a license you're allowed less than a watt and only in specified bands, but also "not to harass, interfere or annoy". Either way this is noncompliant (the fact that it's specifically designed to be the other kind of noncompliant does not help)

D
Dr Qua · December 28, 2025

this is hot

F
Franck Martin · December 28, 2025

Nice one. What would also be cool is a DIY sonic array locator…to locate drones. I just saw cameras with 64 microphones that locate sound sources.

B
Benn Jordan · December 29, 2025

I have a few of those! One that I made with 16, and one commercial one I was sent over. In my experiences they work great for like, finding a leak or a bird in a tree, but the speed of sound is way too slow to accurately track a moving drone, unfortunately.

b
boatbomber · December 28, 2025

Next they'll make reflective jackets illegal for making it harder to photograph you 😔

T
Thunda Struk · December 28, 2025

Hold on, lets start with sunglasses...

A
Anna Choi · December 28, 2025

Good work 👏

B
Brandon Aaskov · December 28, 2025

Did you muck with the video stream via ARP (presumably with scapy or similar)?

a
adfaklsdjf · December 29, 2025

It sounds like that's the big question and we've been given all the explicit information we're going to get at this point, in this medium... but yes, thank you :)

S
SteviejoneS · December 28, 2025

Good for you Benn!