Could you kill one for the good of the many?

I am not a psychopath but I think I would do this if I was the only one that could save millions of people from hunger for ever. Total human happiness will increase. My personal guilt and shame would be of small consequence.

I don't know about international law, but in Germany there is a distinction between killiing (called "Todschlag") and murder ("Mord"). For murder your motive has to be (purely) selfish...

The video about Nelson's column was actually the very first of your videos that I ever saw, been hooked ever since!

From Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov": "Tell me yourself, I challenge your answer. Imagine that you are creating a fabric of human destiny with the object of making men happy in the end, giving them peace and rest at last, but that it was essential and inevitable to torture to death only one tiny creature- that baby beating its breast with its fist, for instance- and to found that edifice on its unavenged tears, would you consent to be the architect on those conditions? Tell me, and tell the truth." "No, I wouldn't consent," said Alyosha softly. "And can you admit the idea that men for whom you are building it would agree to accept their happiness on the foundation of the unexpiated blood of a little victim? And accepting it would remain happy for ever?" "No, I can't admit it."