Radio War Nerd EP #581 — Missile Warfare, feat. Jennifer Kavanagh
Guest: Jennifer Kavanagh, Defense Priorities
Recorded: February 11, 2026
We talk to defense analyst Jennifer Kavanagh about the asymmetry between missiles and anti-missile systems in modern warfare, defense procurement, Ukraine, and the Munich Security Conference.
Read Jennifer's article "What happens when we give Europe first dibs on US missiles for war" in Responsible Statecraft. Follow Jennifer on Twitter.
Total time: 53:24
Direct link to this episode's mp3 here
*
Buy & review John Dolan's new book, They Should Have Been Hanged: War Nerd Essays on the U.S. Civil War
Subscribe to Radio War Nerd at patreon.com/radiowarnerd
Sound production by Telescope Audio
Comments (32)
Had the joy of explaining to someone the Millennium Challenge 2002 the other day.
Still blows my mind, yet does not surprise me in the least that they just straight up changed the rules to make the other side winning anything not allowed lmao. The epitomy of "I'm taking my ball home with me"
Her comment about Israel’s “need” to defend itself from Hamas’ “poor” rockets truly stopped me in my tracks
Me too, she really should have added an addendum to every comment she made about the perspectives of bad people where she suggests that they're evil, stupid, or lying, I know it really improves the show when John does it every few minutes.
Very informative I just found the comment about the USA going full ww2 production mode to be kind of odd. To steal someone’s phrase “we aren’t those people anymore”
It'd definitely take a couple years, a lot of money, and a concerted political effort, but we could do it. It would take some serious pressure, though, and it's difficult to imagine how that situation would come about. So in that sense it's extremely unlikely, even if not theoretically impossible. The ruling class would be wary of reindustrialization because it would make unions stronger and give workers some power over the economy again. It wouldn't be easy to make them allow it to happen, just like it wasn't easy to mobilize the country in WWII. That was a massive undertaking that was only possible because, very broadly speaking, people hated and feared the Nazis and were outraged after the attack on Pearl Harbor, and because the New Deal had already mobilized millions of people into working on big state projects.
I need you, Mark and JD. To understand that the West is right and they know they are right and they are winning and know they are winning. They are right for the wrong reasons, but for now their delusions are cushioned by trillions of dollars and the most effective and massive hard and soft power machinery of control that has ever existed in history. The Carney speech wasn’t a concession speech like Arnaud Bertrand said. It was a warning: the gloves are off. The Trump Administration was given power because he’s the man those in power need and want to take the gloves off and take the heat for it. They get to look principled while “reluctantly” and “slowly” reverting all their actions and all their power moves to the ways that worked before 1945. And this time they are going to take everything or destroy it. That means the western hemisphere, Africa, near east, south and Southeast Asia, Eurasia, and the final bosses are Russia and China. As it was and as it always will be. But they are going to do everything to destroy both and they’re not going to fuck up like the Nazis did before NATO took the reich’s place or the way Japan fucked up in China.
RWN should get Ted Postol on some time to talk Patriots etc
One of the better episodes in a while. Thanks War Boys!
Did anyone chiming in to hate on the guest even bother reading her article? Or listening to the episode? The point of interviewing her was to get an idea of the current reality of U.S. logistics, the political mechanisms through which aid is being delivered to Ukraine, etc.. This is the first time on the show that someone has been able to talk in detail about these things. I'm willing to believe she's wrong about certain things, like the quality of this interceptor vs. that interceptor, or how great the THAAD is. But that's not the main point of the interview, or her article. It's a snapshot of the American empire's ability to manufacture missile defense systems, the leadership's political priorities and commitments (and how they changed from Biden to Trump 2.0), and some of the ramifications. It's genuinely enlightening to know just how few Patriots are manufactured a month, and how fast our stockpiles of certain materiel gets cleared out when they're actually needed. The stuff about Europe being potentially stronger than Russia if they just worked together and the U.S. needing to be more careful in shepherding its resources so it still has gas in the tank for other potential crises is whatever. A matter of opinion.
I understand that. I think some people do. But that doesn’t make the Blob’s position not-idiotic on matters like reindustrialization
Some of yall really continue to surprise me “Why does this person, whose entire education and career has been inside an ecosystem that takes its first principles from established foreign policy blob precepts, not understand these obvious contradictions??” Yeah. I wonder
its more a question of why bother interviewing someone whose analysis is so blinkered in such a predictable way
The “imbalance between the unit cost of offensive and defensive weapons” is a puzzle piece I’ve been looking for, for a while. I think it fits in with the pendulum swing from “highly and expensively trained professional soldiers” (ie French knights/heavy cavalry) to cheaply trained & armored conscripts/levee on masse soldiers (idk, crossbow men). Spitballing, I guess one way you can look at the changing dynamics of the battlefield is by calculating the disparity between the number of man hours put into a soldier on one side and the number of man hours put into the counter for that soldier, or piece of equipment
I think aswell it’ll boil down to how many troops you’re willing to lose. Which won’t be many for the US. Its different for a country defending its borders of course. Would b interesting if the US actually broke out a hot war with iran. My guess is that israel would be levelled but i’m no authority.
Jennifer is wrong to take European leaders at their word that they genuinely doubt Europe's ability to defend itself against Russia. These are not (generally speaking) stupid people, and they fully understand that Russia is no threat to any NATO country. They're just paid well to pretend otherwise.
From the elite POV I don’t know if I agree. Rationally they should know this. But the engrained hate and fear the EU elite has for Russia is pretty real. If it was simply a matter of the elites and their interests, would they have cut off the cheap, consistent flow of Russian gas ?
Told you. Rubio just made the U.S. position to Europe clear: Be our Eurasian Israel and wage covert war on Russia for the next century or we will leave you to be gobbled up by your former colonies. https://xcancel.com/BenjaminNorton/status/2022877849300988392#m
Every midwit who talks about how the U.S. ramped up industrial production for WW2 is oblivious to the status of American manufacturing, power generation, and the literal nuts and bolts of what would be constructed now vs. what was being constructed in 1942 as a matter of complexity and as a matter of what raw and processed materials we have in the U.S. for what was being built in 1942 vs. what we need to build our toys now. Sure, if you need to construct 200 million new AR-15s in a month you can reprogram every CNC in the country. If you need to build one F-35, you need raw and processed materials from China that in a war we are not going to have and if we're lucky we can figure out how to build a single F-35 100% domestically in 16 months. The reality is that if the U.S. ever needs to ramp up wartime production, it's already over. Manufacturing has remained stagnant for 25 years. The shift to a wartime command economy requires political, economic, legal, and social leadership and investment that does not exist and will never exist again in this country absent this level of shock, which will not bring anyone together. It will have everyone tearing each other throats out. Whatever is left will have to pick up that burden/responsibility, but at that point you will have a much bigger problem just in terms of who is going to keep the lights on and who is going to deal with the debt collectors now that the dollar is dead.
Well said. I'm not always inclined to look towards someone's academic background first, but shrugging and saying "it happened then so it can happen now" without worrying about the difference between the two "it"s or the gulf between then and now is a familiar flavor from academics who went through American political science and government studies. They have a way of making American economics PhDs look thoughtful, which is awfully hard to do. I tend to agree that RWN should interview people with Kavanagh's background from time to time but I wonder if Mark and John could push back a little more on claims like the WWII thing. I think they both have enough of a historical sense (and intuition for material conditions) to have clocked this as silly. Ah, anyway, doing interviews is hard and I'm glad I listened to this one, but yeesh
i can't say i learned much from this one
Thank you for your contribution.
May need an Ukraine update soon. I know we’ve been sticking to general negotiations/strategic updates, but as far as I can tell Ukraine is having a legitimate counter offensive in Donbas. For February they may have even equaled or outgained russia in terms of square kilometers. But even if that’s inaccurate we’d all appreciate an update lol
Nothing is legitimate about Ukraine except PR
20:40-20:50 Its interesting that this view still dominates the defense discussion. People think that industrial capacity is something that you can just turn on with the press of a button. Did people collectively forget that the elites sold off our domestic industrial base decades ago?
And that, in order to ramp up production during WWII, massive state intervention in the economy was required. Our current class of oligarchs would never allow that.
Thank you for limiting it to 40 minutes. Such a waste of time. Bachelor & PhD in Political Science and Government. Has very little idea of the substance of what she is talking about -- physics, manufacturing, mass production, technical characteristics of the weapon systems. Claimed that THAAD is the best of the best (face palm), that U.S. could ramp up military production a'la WWII (not possible no matter the money), that Ukrainians've been successful in intercepting Russian missiles (!) and drones, that U.S. just didn't give its better systems (name one that actually exists) because of the concerns of the U.S. deeper involvement in targeting (can it get any deeper?), "because Russia is a dictatorship" (double facepalm). Bollocks from start to finish. A typical D.C. think tank parasite. Worse than Sam Bendett because I felt Sam was aware of his grift while she came across as a true believer in her own B.S.
Her comment about how Europe could be stronger than Russia if they just organized themselves better was particularly revealing. Europeans won't do that because they see it as a threat to their national sovreignty. Does she not know that or is it just one of those facts that's too inconvenient to factor that into the analysis?
Giving WW2 as an example of how production can be ramped up when they really need it? Production capacity , skilled labour, supply chains , critical minerals , a capable political class , a willing population? Just an opinion, but does anyone think that just because of necessity the current USA could morph into WW2 USA in short notice? It would have to be a concerted effort by society to get into that kind of shape. Otherwise it sounds like magical thinking.
I don’t think many people who listen to this podcast are particularly interested in the strategic interests of the United States.’
Understanding how people inside and adjacent to the US government see the situation is interesting though, even if I don’t agree with them.
First.
