A SERIOUS CAMBRIDGE BIBLE DOCTRINAL ERROR
Those who have ears to hear, will hear.
Comments (34)
I and many others have previously answered your question, so take the time to find the answer. I'll not repeat myself.
1 kings stay on track🙄🙄
That is your track, not mine. See above video.
Cool now can you just answer the question that I just stipulated instead of going around it and bringing up something completely different what you have done for the last 3 weeks just answer the question
It's obvious that you are a 1769 Blaney KJV only-ist. And, probably an Independent Fundamental Baptist, or something akin. I'm not against the Authorized King James Bible published first in 1611, I'm against unauthorized revisions that came later.
And I can promise you one thing in life Reginald you don't make rules for me get that
1 kings 4:26 vs 2 chronicles 9:25 I'm having problems arguing with people who are not King James only and by the way I am King James only and the only thing I can say is that it says Solomon had 4,000 stalls for horses and chariots , but in the previous verse it doesn't say in 1Kings he had 40,000 stalls for horses for his chariots so I think in First Kings it was strictly 40,000 stalls only of horses, whereas in second chronicles it says 4,000 stalls for horses and chariots which would mean the Chariots would be in those stalls TOGETHER with the horses? in other words together , what do you think and no I'm not trying to argue I'm trying to win arguments against people who are against the King James
Eve condemned herself when she disobeyed God, and she condemned all mankind; however, whether she came to faith or not later, we don't know. But, all are born condemned because of her and Adam. Yet, all can be saved through faith in Christ.
Okay thanks for answering I actually agree with that I do think she's in heaven though one more question my friend mathew 26:34 says might instead of night?
eve condemning herself true/false, is a cool topic for a video - the length of this thread became too long :) such is life this one, i think of often luke 5:16 And he withdrew himselfe [...] into the wildernesse, and prayed
I see NOWHERE that Reg insulted you first. You are the one railing and calling people names. By the way, everyone I have ever known that has ever called themselves a "true Christian" had proved themselves to be false. If there is such thing as a Textus Receptus/Masoretic Text English Bible believing cult, then I guess I am a member. The only leader I have is Jesus Christ Himself and no man stands in the way. If you want to believe in an online Masoretic Text then go for it. You don't think the Hebrew and Greek were corrupted by the counter-reforming Jesuits after the 1611 was published? Where is your content showing all of your translational break throughs? In the meantime I will trust the pure word of the 1611.
I HAVE A 1611. geesh. math 26:34 is wrong, though , in the 1611. night not might. Ez 24:7 should have "not" as well!! this is not "jesuits". And don't question whether I'm born again or not because I could question you the exact same question be careful with that Christ is my judge not you worm
Now, answer these questions and defend yourself or stop wasting our time posting things you cannot defend
The end of the month is coming, and you'll be gone.
Your insults will not drive me away Reggie that is a tact of the devil
condemned*
Yeah I know , my buddies aren't sensitive little panty wastes , anyways, and you're also not a " sir", we've CERTAINLY established that, by the way, REGINALD ( is that better, Reggie?), you sure get offended easy for calling yourself a Christian anyways this is the 7th time I've asked you this and I'm asking you going to public forum sir you wrote in your book that Eve content herself to hell is this true or not now this is a very simple question
I'm not your buddy.
If anyone has a spirit of darkness and cowardice it's you don't hurl blasphemies at me buddy
I am not sure what you're trying to accomplish here. There are many places you can go if you want to discuss just how great the Pure Cambridge Bible is. Reg was not cursing you. You are cursing yourself. He goes to a great effort to help lead people to the truth. His mission is not to hand feed people the scriptures, but to share his research with others to help them discern truth. I don't think railing on anyone is appropriate. There are many other seminary-types that could use some criticism and conveniently they don't put themselves out there to be criticized. I pray that you find truth and repent of your railing ways.
Furthermore you're being hypocritical by cursing me and you haven't answered a single one of my questions here I'll prove it answer this why did you say Eve condemned herself to hell in your book?
ahhh, you say I'm condescending but you end your little paragraph with a curse I never cursed you.
While under the cover of the "Message" section, your comments were riddled with disrespect, demands, condescension, insults, pretense and complete disregard for the spirit of this site. You made it clear that you came not to edify, but to tear down and puff yourself up. Should you continue to comment publicly in the manner that you seem accustomed, it's only a matter of time before all will see the dark spirit that presides over you. If you are looking for debates and arguments, and it's plain you are, go back to YouTube from whence you came. This site is for the edification and building up of the saints, not tearing them down to make yourself feel important. I have answered most of your questions (if not all) in my book that you claim to have, so I'll not dignify you by repeating myself. If you are dissatisfied with my explanations, so be it. But, insulting me by pretending they were not answered, and that I cannot discern your agenda to take a piece out of me, is an error on your part. May God show you the same grace you show others.
Just answer the question if you know
Why don't you tell us what it means. I'm sure you have already made up your mind.
Why because you don't know the answers is that way. You also did not answer any of my questions about why you said eve condemned herself to hell in your book and so on and so on you just dodge questions you don't answer anything. A few other questions I asked you is why you believe the Hebrew when I look it up online is wrong when it says things like "not upon the ground" , in Ezekiel but you just won't answer you just run away
What does Matthew 16:28 mean if it was 2023 years ago those people are clearly dead but it says not taste that
I have the same problem, though I was baptized in a Protestant Church, and I believe most members were believers; still, the churches have gone so far astray, it's hard to be a part of them. Most are corporations of the state, and by that have already placed themselves under Caesar first, and Christ second. It's critical that Acts 2:38 has the correct commas, as that establishes the parenthetical clause and renders the doctrine of salvation by turning from self to Christ and him alone.
Yep! It's the circumcision of the heart which is FAITH alone. Just as Abraham was faithful and never questioning God Almighty BEFORE he was circumcised as a physical sign of faith to God. This Acts 2:38 scripture is often times misconstrued and this explains why. I would love to be baptized by a group of Bible believing Christians as an outward sign of my faith, but (outside of my own household) I don't really know where to find any in my area. I keep praying that we will find a true congregation.
I've asked him three extremely simple questions, and all he does is berate me and say I have a ' spirit of Darkness ', when it's actually him that has this chicken spirit and spirit of darkness, not me, I'm a real Christian, and I will never be bullied by a man who calls himself Reginald, and writes false books ,because he doesn't know how to answer three simple questions? answers ???Because he knows it's hypocrisy . Number one :did Eve condemn herself to hell like he says in his book " the real 1611", by Reginald Block. Number two: is the online Hebrew wrong when it says "not on the ground" , in the Ezekiel verse? number 3 if it is wrong why is the online Hebrew wrong? is he saying that the people that have Hebrew books are wrong when they translate it to English ? three very simple questions and none of you can answer them but I'm sure you'll go back to name calling and running away like little girls cuz that's what you seem to like to do and you seem to do it on a regular basis because you don't have the answers and you don't know what you're talking about and it's embarrassing ! if you don't know, reggie, just say you don't know -
You said you have my book "Authorized, The Real 1611 King James Bible." I suggest you read it, before ignorantly responding to something well-explained therein. I suspect you have the pdf and not the book. Is that correct?
The information contained in this book was the one that confirmed what I saw with my own eyes that still work ok. LOL. I think you could spend many years doing it or go directly to the differences in this reference material and save time because you can use you own eyes. Thank you Reg. Perhaps I will visit the US and order the physical copy if God wills that I do. If we are still alive I will thank you personally.
Look at the commas. Things that are different are not the same. The 1611 frames the parenthetical clause, which determines correct meaning. If I have to explain this to you, then there is little hope of us agreeing on anything.
Acts 2:38 is identical in the 1611 and a pure Cambridge