💦 CREATE AND FUCK YOUR OWN AI CUMSLUT 🔥 TRY NOW ♥
Create AI Cumsluts 💦
November 17, 2023

Oxford & Cambridge Revisions

This short video explains essential differences between the first publication of the 1611 AKJB and subsequent revisions, purported to be translations. 

Comments (16)

K
KT · January 14, 2024

Okay, Thank you

R
Reginald Jacob Block · January 14, 2024

Keep it around for reference. I still have mine, and sometimes compare various verses with the 1611 AKJB.

K
KT · January 13, 2024

What are we to do with the old corrupt KJV Bibles given to us by our folks or purchased by us before knowing the truth?

R
Reginald Jacob Block · November 21, 2023

I believe he died in debtor's prison, if my memory serves me.

R
Reginald Jacob Block · November 20, 2023

That article is a joke. The so-called second printing of the 1611 was so corrupted that Barker, the printer, was sued for producing it, and eventually he ended up in debtor's court, and bankrupt.

D
Dylan Schulz · November 18, 2023

I just scanned that article. "Already Corrected" needs changed to "already corrupted"! I would take a pre-1611 translation any day over anything after.

R
Reginald Jacob Block · November 17, 2023

I wouldn't spend too much time on bible protector. It primarily promotes Bibles that largely agree with the Blaney 1769 KJV, and that being the so-called Pure Cambridge.

T
Terence Tremethick · November 18, 2023

Yes found that too - "PURIFICATION SIX: In 1769, Blayney" So they gave themselves away there. Purification was already complete. Subtlety in their words.

R
Ryan Johnson · November 17, 2023

What do you guys think of the article I just sent you is it true please give it a read

R
Ryan Johnson · November 17, 2023

http://www.bibleprotector.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=56

R
Reginald Jacob Block · November 17, 2023

I've found that not everything that claims to be a first printing is a first printing. Unless the text matches the text held in the British Museum, it isn't a first printing.

D
Dylan Schulz · November 17, 2023

They claim that they are 1611 first printings. I bought an 1841 Bagster's Hexapla facsimile (which has very valuable English Bible history) from them and they are very responsive to email. I planned on asking those exact questions if I was to order one. Here is the site if you want to check it out. They have a smaller one also. https://thebiblemuseum.com/product/1611-king-james-kjv-bible-deluxe-synthetic-leather-puilpit-folio-size-edition/

R
Ryan Johnson · November 20, 2023

http://www.bibleprotector.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=56

R
Reginald Jacob Block · November 17, 2023

I'm not familiar with the Bible Museum. Have you compared Genesis 3:5, Song of Solomon 2:7 and Ezekiel 24:7 among other verses? Do they agree with the Hendrickson and the Oxford Quatercentenary?

T
Terence Tremethick · November 18, 2023

I asked about he VS she with one that looked identical and to my surprise they said he. That was the KJV store. I have a copy myself of the one that says he. It was one sold in places like Wallmart. I ordered it at the beginning and kept it but never read it after I got the Hendrickson and saw the former said he.

D
Dylan Schulz · November 17, 2023

Good morning! I am starting to think God won't let them tamper with the first printing! Luckily Hendrickson Rose (although printing loads of nonsense) prints a good quality cheap copy. I plan on buying a couple of cases to give out. I think the facsimile from The Bible Museum out of Arizona is the first printing also if anyone likes the black letter.