COMPARING REFORMATION BIBLES
This video study is largely in response to some errant videos posted lately on YouTube. Hopefully, this study will help students of Reformation Bibles, particularly the 1611 Authorized King James Bible, understand the value of the earlier Reformation Bibles and how the 1611 AKJB corrects problems in them. I often focus on the Matthew Bible, as the misguided videos I have seen state their preference for the Matthew Bible over the 1611 Authorized King James Bible. (The above video is based on the attached pdf, also previously uploaded with slight variations in text.
Comments (2)
Is there anything founding the claim that King James l didn't like some of the notes in the 1560 Geneva? I personally think he did the right thing as some notes are interesting, but some are a bit opinionated without founding evidence. And if they came from John Calvin then it makes since why he didn't like the Anabaptists too much as they were actually following Jesus' Word! I wonder if all negativity towards King James is 100% Jesuit propaganda? Look at what Bibles are worth the most money. It sure isn't the fake KJV Catholic Bibles!
You are wise to regard margin notes cautiously. Let God be true but every man a liar.