IMPORTANT IF YOU WANT TO HELP | READ DESCRIPTION.
So this goes in order of 1 : 2, 1 :2, etc. So 1st of the image set would be 0.45 and 2nd would be 0.60:
1 being a denoiser of 0.45 making lines less sharp and easing anti-aliasing giving more of a "drawn" feeling to generations.
2 being a denosier of 0.60 in latent space which makes lines sharper and gives the images a more "refined" yet AI feel to them since it's so perfect. But it does technichally increase quality at a the cost of it being a little too on the nose with lineart and stroke definition.
I'm stuck between these two and need you guys to either reply with a 1 or 2 depending on which you liked overall. Ignore major artifacts because these images were not touched up or processed to keep things objective. Let me know your thoughts, thank you!
PS: A good way to have an easy time seeing the difference is by following Astolfo's hair and then kinda using it as a guide to 'notice' the difference in line work. The last one being the most obvious.
Comments (3)
Sounds good, I'll be using #2 from now on.
I’d say #2
Hard to choose but I'd pick 2
