WOTMQ: Apatheist, Part II
In part two, I talk more specifically about the lack of reliable knowledge and whey the theology surrounding The Tribal War god of Abraham make knowledge of such a being impossible. From the supernatural, to Satan and his minions.
Thanks again, you beautiful people, you. If I lived close enough, I would wash each of your cars! B
Comments (5)
People like the idea of agency. So a storm might be called “an act of God.” That God, in fact, caused the storm is unfalsifiable. Why God did it is open to complete conjecture. How God did it is unknowable as well as if God will do it again. We are left with a vague notion that God’s involvement with the storm gives the storm a purpose, even if that purpose is unknown. Such an agency, I would argue, is useless.
Maybe even harmful(?).
Why would an all-knowing deity test anything? Doesn't it know whether you believe ort not? Or is the test a sham, used to make you believe there is a deity? Gasp? You mean the priests could have lied about fossil tests and faith test? Gasp!
Get your Christian pretzels here! Have a Kalam! Get your morally sufficient reasons!
Bingo. I've long thought that the apologists in our former cult could open a pretzel franchise, the way they twist and bake in logic and reason to defend illogical, unreasonable beliefs clearly disproven by science.