WOTM: Low Bar Bill, Part III
This time, we look at the actual comment which set the YouTube Atheist community on fire. The moment we all had to watch two or three times to make sure we were hearing what we thought we were hearing — from Christianity's premiere apologist!!!
This is one of those months where I just didn't have enough time. I was consuming all the other WLC content my various Atheist comrades were creating, and taking notes for my own videos. I actually got lost and overwhelmed this month — there was so much I wanted to say and so much stupidity to deal with. I'm still not finished with this topic, but I don't think it will consume so much of my content next month, if you're worried about that.
I was just happy that you beautiful people gave me the time and opportunity to wrap my head around this and hopefully confront the nonsense in a way which is both enlightening and entertaining. That's always the goal... a goal I couldn't even think about without your continued support. Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you. I hope you enjoy this month's crop. And I hope you can tell I enjoyed the harvest.
I'll see you next month. Until then, stay safe and smart. 'Cause some people can't do both (or either). Big love to all of you. And of course, blessings! B
Comments (7)
Well, I'm definitely… "another form of life." Sorry, Billy. Y'know… since reality isn't your cup-a-tea… why not move to North Korea now? Why wait for the celestial version that lasts forever… with your all-knowing, all-powerful, all-loving Kim Jong-Elohim?
I have to use that — Kim John-Elohim! Love it!
And WLC has a Doctorate in BS! As many other apologists have :-)
I'm proud to be "another form of life" :-) Better than being another empty headed believer :-o
That said, I am no apologist for Craig, (heh heh) but, Kyle is no ordinary, average semi-informed Christian. He remains a committed Catholic with strong faith and his own "evidence" of God. In other YouTube posts, with skeptics, e.g., Paulogia, he holds his own quite handily. He is very familiar with abstruse religious terms and concepts. I had to use Google several times while listening to him. So Kyle is no "lost sheep" forsaken by the unconvincing Craig. And there was no chance that an unsatisfactory answer from Craig would lead to Kyle's deconversion or even dent his apparently strong Catholic faith. Google suggests "Socratic ignorance" as one description of Kyle's question to Craig.
I learned about Kyle as well. But Craig knew none of that.
Even though I'm getting tired of the Bill and Kyle show.