PragerFU: Does Science Argue For or Against God?
This is my take-down of the fine-tuning argument. Others have made more extensive rebuttals, but this one looks at how deceptive the bait and switch of this argument is for those embracing the Tribal War god of Abraham. The fine-tuning argument is an argument for a Deist god. But Judeo-Christian apologists use is as though it has some value in terms of demonstrating the existence of their very different God — one who cares, is all-knowing, all-powerful, etc... I don't really have a problem with Deism. I just don't understand why anyone would embrace it. Please enjoy!
And thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you for your continued support. B
Comments (3)
This "argument" has been around too long and seems to always get dug up again by an apologist who has run out of the other "false arguments".
The universe is finely tuned to kill us.
The naïveté of the sheeple at P.U. (*pinches nose*) runs deep. Have they never even looked at what happens to their fellow human beings all over this planet, and realized that it completely undermines the notion of an god "who cares"? A.C. Grayling put it succinctly in his essay "God and Disaster": <a href="https://www.pangeaprogress.com/blog/philosopher-ac-grayling-god-disaster" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.pangeaprogress.com/blog/philosopher-ac-grayling-god-disaster</a>