This Will Be My Last Post on This Topic

I’ve read your comments and explained my perspective, but I feel like some people are judging me as though I had started generating my animations or CC with AI. That simply isn’t the case. I put hours of work into what I create, and experimenting with a rendering tool doesn’t erase any of that.

I also think we need to be careful about treating every use of generative AI as the same thing. INZOI includes generative AI features that can create textures, 3D objects, and animations. KRAFTON has publicly stated that its models were trained using internal data, commercially licensed assets, and legally acquired open datasets. That doesn’t automatically settle every ethical question, but it shows why looking at how a specific technology is developed matters.

Does that mean everyone who has played, shared, or promoted inZOI automatically supports every ethical issue associated with generative AI? I don’t think so.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, is a generative neural rendering system. It works with an existing game scene and its rendering data to generate or enhance visual details such as lighting and materials. It doesn’t create my animations, models, or CC for me. The creative work remains mine, while I’m experimenting with a different visual rendering of it.

Of course, that doesn’t make DLSS 5 automatically free from ethical concerns, and I’m not claiming that it does. I simply think these distinctions matter when discussing a technology and the choices people make about using it.

And when it comes to environmental impact, I absolutely agree that it matters.

Eating meat, flying, buying fast fashion, and frequently replacing electronic devices also have environmental consequences. I don’t think that means everyone must become vegan, stop travelling, or give up technology. It means we should try to make informed, responsible choices and recognize that none of us lives without an environmental footprint.

What I do find hypocritical is judging someone else’s choices while refusing to acknowledge the impact of our own.

I’m not using these examples to dismiss the concerns around AI. I’m simply saying that I don’t think it’s fair to judge someone’s character or values based on one experiment, especially without knowing the person or the work behind what they create.

I respect that some of you choose not to use AI at all, and I’m not asking you to change that.

No one here is asking you to agree with me or to download my content. I don’t care about numbers, and I have no interest in pretending to be someone I’m not just to please others.

Life has already been difficult enough, and I don’t need to add more negativity to a space that I created to share something I love. So, if you feel that you can’t respect me, my opinions, or my work, you’re always free to click unfollow. No hard feelings!

I’ll still wish you all the best.

Martina (tini).

And just a little reminder: if you’re reading this, you’re probably on social media right now. So hey, you’re contributing to an environmental footprint too. I hope you’re ready to delete all your accounts now 😂

See how easy it is to turn a valid concern into a judgment about someone else’s choices? That’s exactly the point I’m trying to make.

If you have valid arguments, please feel free to share them, but do so with RESPECT.

Any judgmental or offensive comments will be reported, and the accounts responsible will be blocked.