March Preliminary Poll
Vote once and carefully. Poll spreadsheets are merged and tallied on March 4th at 8pm.
The top 5 move on to the final round of voting.
Comments (39)
One more thing: Doc does a fantastic job every month, no matter what wins, that's for sure. Actually, the nomination rules should be changed. For example, that each series (or characters) can be nominated only once or at most twice. So if something has already won and it has been made, it cannot be nominated again (or at most it can be nominated once more, but not over and over again). This would give more titles/series/characters a chance. But that decision is Doc's.
I agree, but how do you expect us to trust that these new rules would be respected if they were not respected right here.
The fact that continuations win so often is why I hardly bother suggesting any new ideas anymore. In fact, I stopped being a patron for a while because of that. There needs to be a new rule in place that makes things more fair for ideas that haven't gotten drawn yet. Otherwise, I just might leave again.
dude the rules weren't even followed on this payroll, Dipper's is an example
Miko!!
I've been looking at the comments and maybe it bothers some, but I must say that it is the pure Truth. We've already seen a lot of sequels and repeat characters these months, like MHA recently, one with Miles and Gwen, and I think Gravity Falls with Dipper recently, and now Gravity Falls is winning again. I understand the frustration and anger of many since it is tiring to always see the same thing and also because of how unfair this payroll has been. I have seen that they write that it must be something "Democratic" but the election of the payrolls has not been equally democratic, there are 2 payrolls that should not be there, either due to an error or due to non-compliance with the rules. In short, they must open the doors to new ideas, and that this mistake can be corrected.
I’ve noticed quite a few complaints over this month’s nominations, please take this into consideration Doc has a very full schedule and often relies on us to follow the rules he sets forth. He may not always have time to proofread everything but he tries to make it as right as he can in the end. I more than most understand the frustrations but in the end the Doc has done right as best he can.
Couldn't have said it better myself. It's why I pointed out what happened to me but I didn't pursue it further with the Doc. I know he's busy so I just gave a heads-up.
I would also like to join a few comments. 1. It's really unfortunate that the same characters always appear and other series and their characters don't get a chance. But this is democracy, and if the majority wants it... 2. The voting system is also strange. I noticed that there are nominations what get a second (or third! etc.), but are not included in the preliminary poll. But there were also nominations that did not get a second and was included. How it is? Maybe I just don't understand...
there is one that is repeated and another does not comply with the rules, 2 nominations were not included and that is unfair. And I also want to see something new with new characters.
I will not lose hope, Miko and Marco can still win, I would like to see something new this month.
I also hope so
Wait, I thought Doc said only Male + Female pairings. I didn’t know we could submit lesbian couples. This changes everything.
It is just one male and one female, nothing has really changed. Just give doc some time I’m sure he’s very busy and the last thing he needs is everyone to start disregarding the rules, it’s bad enough the ones that are doing it now.
What's with all the repetitive nominations involving the same characters or at least from the same source? C'mon, we need some variety here. I don't mind continuation and sequels but we need to let ideas of untouched sources a shot.
I really can't with the continuation bias in these polls sometimes, everyone seems to just want what we already had, but again, I wanna see some new characters dammit! Also why is there an option with 1 man + 3 women?
You are not alone. I agree with you 100%. Moat of the nominations arr just repeats of themes we already voted for. The most unique ideas on this one is Marco X Miko and the Danny Phantom ones. Currently, I am rooting for Marco X Miko. Just want to see that Glitch Tech big booty of Miko's.
Miko Kubota! How I would like to see you in your uniform so tight.
I am hoping for her too.
I'm hoping Mabel gets to have her chance in the spotlight with Danny Phantom!
If Zootopia wins there will be 2 continuation comics up for vote and that means neither of them is going to happen sad
This vote is kind of corrupt. - It is supposed to be a maximum of 25 places and there are 19. - There is a repeated nomination, removing the place to one. - Everyone respected the rule of 1 man + 1 woman, and there is a Dipper with 4 characters, it's not fair.
Agreed
Damn… guess I’ll have to wait even longer now for the Dwarves vs. Minotaurs sequel… WHY IS MOXXIE AND VEROSIKA ON THERE TWICE?!?! XD
All types of weirdness for March voting it seems. 😅
Lots of good picks though I have a question about one. There was a Nick and Judy comic?
At the top of the page there is a search feature for each creator's feed. Give it a whirl.
I'm sad that Heracules and Megura aren't on the roster even though it got a second on substar.
Thar Danny phantom 🔥🔥
Dipper again? oh come on, give someone else a chance!
No PogueMon?
Same thing I said when I didnt see it.
Second month in a row my second has counted for nothing. How depressing...
No Transformers nominees this time around shocking 😑
Welp, one road to travel this time. Go Team Venture.
Miko!
Sypha and Trevor is Anime
And apparently transformers is its own category. This is just frustrating. Also, weren't cartoons on hiatus? Whats all this gravity falls and danny phantom then
There are double moxie and verosika