💦 CREATE AND FUCK YOUR OWN AI CUMSLUT 🔥 TRY NOW ♥
Create AI Cumsluts 💦
Small Arms of WWI Primer 129: Dutch Mannlicher 1895
September 1, 2020

Small Arms of WWI Primer 129: Dutch Mannlicher 1895

Comments (21)

G
Guido S · March 28, 2021

WHAT was the name of the salesman?! august schriever? like my family name with a more common spelling. wonder if there is any connection.

B
Bruce Brodnax · September 8, 2020

Nuts. I thought this episode came out longer ago than this. Aaarrrrghghghgh! I've got another WEEK to go b4 more C&Rsenal... :-(

p
patrick j. russell · September 4, 2020

great review

J
John S Wren · September 2, 2020

I've asked in the Discord so I'll ask the collective brain here as well...Auguste Schriever. That name turns up everywhere I look. From Holland to Chile to China. I've read the "Littlegun" brief biog (and I know he published a catalogue that I'd love to own) but can anyone point me towards any more sources about him?

g
gary g. davis · September 2, 2020

great episode! Thank you.

C
C&Rsenal · September 2, 2020

Thank

A
Andrew MacDougall · September 2, 2020

I'm torn on the like&subscribe pitch at the beginning. Because this is a sort of historical documentary series hopefully intended to be dredged up far in the future as a source of information it seems a bit jarring. On the other hand I understand the need to promote the channel.

C
C&Rsenal · September 2, 2020

We've definitely dropped it into a spot where it can be trimmed out on a different platform. However, it does seem to be working at getting the show exposed to more viewers. You work with what you gotta to spread the history.

E
Edwin A. Novak · September 1, 2020

Schlegelmilch? 6.5mm seems a sweet spot in service calibers for many nations. This video is excellent (ausgezeichnet!) and I greatly enjoyed it. Thank you.

A
Andrew MacDougall · September 2, 2020

That was widely agreed at the time and a 7.5mm cartridge was often choosen because of the inadequate "payload" capacity (incendiary against balloons and tracer) of the smaller round. Also a 6.5mm doesn't have the "umph" for the more extreme MG ranges where the lower recoil/easier handling of a 6.5 in a rifle wouldn't matter. In short the ordinary rifleman's usability of the round was sacrificed for the desires of various "specialty" users and the desire to have a uniform ammunition supply. This is described in earlier videos on this channel dealing with 6.5mm designs.

D
Dennis C. Dempsey · September 1, 2020

What you failed to tell us is what level do we need to reach for the new content

C
C&Rsenal · September 1, 2020

The $5 tier and up gets the scans! You do have to select the tier though, just changing your donation level is not enough.

J
John Klear · September 1, 2020

You can actually swap parts with the Romanian rifles, but it’s the 1892, not the 1893. The Romanian 1892 bolt and the Dutch 1895 bolt are identical.

C
C&Rsenal · September 1, 2020

well crap.

C
C W · September 1, 2020

/cough New pistol poster /cough

D
David Hemsath · September 1, 2020

Regarding problems with enbloc clips: Was anything done before or during WW II to make the M1 Garand clips more reliable? (Okay, apologies after reading C&Rsenal’s reply. I wrongly heard that the WW I enbloc clips were problematic even when new.)

C
C&Rsenal · September 1, 2020

Well as-manufactured these might have been plenty reliable. Remember 100% of our examples are used.

R
Robert Patterson · September 1, 2020

Carlos the 1st (Portugal) went with a Steyr like this in 1896-1900 only in mosqueton configuration... I think about 12500 produced.

J
John Klear · September 1, 2020

They’ve covered those in the Romanian episode, Primer 048: https://youtu.be/MhuuFnaCMOw

L
Lachlan Williams · September 1, 2020

othias, this is the 2nd time you've posted something within an hour of an exam. Stop doing this to me

J
John Fugedy · September 1, 2020

Hey Lachlan, good luck on your exam!