FAQ - Questions request!

Hey, mini here (we missed this). I think the initial plan was to capitalize on the release of Premier for those thirsting for the more advanced Playbook shenanigans. In the "down-time" we'll of course be trying to round out the content, we are well aware there's quite a high expectation of skill to implement this stuff but we're hoping that it might still give a clue into how things might be done in a professional team. The suggestions you gave are a good and we appreciate it. We'll probably do a poll soon to see what the general vibe is with our content so far and what people might want more of (whether that's more of the same or not) / less of. That kind of content may just be video content, we'll have to just figure out what we release for public-facing (i.e. Youtube) or Patreon (patreon uploads).

Hey mini here, I just watched quickly with no audio. But it seems Raze is overcommitted on rubble with no escape option. Raze needs to be ready to fallback here in situations where they are left alone (especially late round where the attack needs to still take a LOT of space to get to A or B(split)).

Hey, mini here. This is such a good question that I thought I'd give a sense for an answer now (because it'll take a while for us to get through the FAQ in the way we want to do it!) One thing you need to note straight away is that at a "lower level" the skill difference between teams you are playing regularly might be quite high; so a team that is seemingly +Wing onto you will still win if they are better individually BUT you can close the gap easier with structure/macro. There is also a teething period when adding structure where sometimes it feels you might have performed better without it, but the key thing is to grind through that period and keep assessing the structure as a team. The structure won't be perfect and may be restrictive when you start. The last thing I'd note is that you should change your style when playing against these teams. Against a team that is just +Wing there is no point of using early info cycling (recons etc) and instead want to hold that util for when they come to you. Playing not to get picked off individually (stay in pairs), often in a slightly more passive way is usually a good plan. OPing is also a great counter to this style. Overall it can be frustrating, but as long as your team is bought into the system and you keep evaluating it together, it SHOULD be the most consistent route to building a team.