💦 CREATE AND FUCK YOUR OWN AI CUMSLUT 🔥 TRY NOW ♥
Create AI Cumsluts 💦
September 8, 2025

October bonus video poll

Vote as many times as you like. Leave a comment if there is something specific within the topic.

Thanks! Happy Monday, I guess poll ends Wednesday or so.

Comments (31)

T
Thomas Okken · October 2, 2025

I'm too late to the party because I only just joined Patreon a couple of days ago, but now I see that our girl has offered Maxwell as an option three times in a row, and it still hasn't won? That's a tragedy. Physics fans, do better please!

T
The Family Barlev · October 11, 2025

I keep forgetting to log into Patreon and actually vote. The fact that if you and I and one other person had voted for Maxwell then Angela wouldn't have needed to make the Sabine one? Tragedy.

P
Petteri Rinne · September 10, 2025

could you bring back angela's choice? I don't see the point of you discussing something you don't care about.

m
mykey6375 · September 10, 2025

Angela's Choice! Angela's Choice! Angela's Choice! Three cheers for Angela's Choice! Hip, Hip, Hooray!

B
Burro Fiddle · September 10, 2025

I voted for Maxwell and NASA. Not for Sabine. But, knowing her former blog, I respect her a lot. I just wished, she would choose words sometimes more carefully and not say "Science", when she means "Academic Establishment". And better thumbnails.

m
mykey6375 · September 10, 2025

Thing is, writing (speaking) is a complicated thing, The writer/speaker is juggling a lot of objectives, often in mutual conflict. Reaching her audience is #1. Who they are must be always in her mind. For a creator lucky enough to be "an influencer" like Sabine, the goals are much the same as "the algorithm" that we sometimes demonize that selects the social media posts that we "might" be interested in. Is there something like "should be" implied? Or is it just more or less manipulation based on an extremely good, & highly successful, prediction of their effect on us? I could point out that English is not Sabine's native language. But that's a dangerous thread to pick at. I don't think it's explanatory in this instance. Let me merely suggest that lack of care might not be the operative choice Sabine is making. She carefully chooses her words to fit her purposes. P.S. Let me add, please, that arguing against the academic establishment, but then "accidentally" tarring the entire label of "Science" with it, is one example of a rhetorical fallacy called Mott & Bailey that is increasingly relevant in modern discourse, against which most critical readers are not adequately schooled. You give Sabine a pass bc you "know what she meant". If I could advise you, I would suggest not to attribute a motive of making an innocent mistake, to Sabine's IMO likely very deliberate word choices.

P
PV=nRT baby · September 9, 2025

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE MAXWELL

T
Thomas Fahey · September 9, 2025

Mess with Sabine at your own risk.

E
Eric Brodeur · September 10, 2025

I think this comment kinda sums it all up, in a way, doesn’t it? In unrelated news, please do Sabine.

V
Vaskó Richárd · September 9, 2025

I feel this is the revenge of the math guys for the last video. Some people just enjoy drama ... One thing that came to my mind there could be a bonus video about how collapse-aware Angela is on a 1 to 9 scale. There are certain hints interspersed here and there (like growing food in the "apocalypse physics" video last year, or the comment about "in a generation there won't be coffee at all" I don't recall where, or the habit of making your own clothes, or moving away from the big city and closer to the lakes and so on). Let's say Al Gore is 1, Greta Thunberg is 3, Nate Hagens is 5, Jem Bendell is 7 and Guy McPherson is 9, so the scale is descending from somehow normalish green politics into cluelessness, solitude, obscurity and at the very end into lovecraftian madness. Leena Norms seems to be around 2.1.

R
Robbie Warren · September 8, 2025

Maxwell or NASA for me - I’d rather watch something Angela has a personal interest in rather than what members choose. Being back Angela’s Choice I say.

C
Clair High · September 8, 2025

I think have seen enough on S. Hossenfelder. Bring on Maxwell!

m
mykey6375 · September 8, 2025

AFAICT, "as many times" is a misleading way to put it. I get to upvote from any to all of the topics. I cannot double vote any single one of them. If I'm wrong about that, someone please explain how I've got the wrong end of the stick. If it so happens there's some way to downvote, it'd be so nice if someone could please contradict my disbelief about that. I have mixed feelings about Sabine. Generally, what Dr. Collier already said right here, right now, in the comments, in one sentence, is totally 'nuff said. Everyone, please just take her word for it. Stop upvoting. Sabine did reassure me on many ways I had filled in the blanks in my understanding of basics that would've been obvious to a student like Dr. Collier coming up, but that I felt like I was just guessing about. As soon as Sabine shifted her emphasis to topics over which she has a grudge, I stopped gaining new physics knowledge from that source. If you are sucked in by Sabine's present product line of clickbait, just get over it. Look up Mott & Bailey. It's a grift tactic leveraging off of "shifting the goalposts" to let you believe they're being reasonable while they never truly back away from outlandish bad-faith claims. Example from current fashionable discourse: "Just asking questions" lets evil people plant evil seeds while pretending to keep an open mind. The claim that legitimate doubts is all they're up to is the lie.

B
Bryn · September 8, 2025

Please please 🙏 don't do Sabine. Though I guess that would be prime rant material. i'm rethinking it.

S
Steve Curtis · September 8, 2025

Based on some of the comments here I am guessing I'm an outlier in being fans of both Dr. Collier and Dr. Hossenfelder. Being out of my field, I really don't have a way of calibrating against the popular physics communicators I've been pulling away from. If both voices resonate with me and both seem to have valid criticisms from my naive point of view... idk.

m
mykey6375 · September 8, 2025

Cut that out! Don't waffle after people much like you have told you what you need to know to make your mind up. Just take our word for it. Sabine used to be a science communicator. Now she's poison. End of. That's my opinion. But I was a reader of Sabine's blog years before she made a video channel. I know who we lost. Sabine isn't that person anymore.

S
Stephan Wimmer · September 8, 2025

Hossenfelder *shudder* I hope something else wins out xD

J
Jim Sarbinoff · September 8, 2025

Seconding the argument for Maxwell because Angela has already shown that he should be at least as famous as that guy with the drums and the throat singing.

D
Donald Pearson · September 8, 2025

We only get 12 of these a year and people really want to waste it on Sabine? That's the real mystery.

R
R. J. Lesch · September 8, 2025

As someone who is trying to read quantum theory texts, I'm aware of the gaps in my mathematical knowledge. If you don't do a full video on the topic, a quick post on where to start (Lie groups? Hamiltonian systems? etc.) would be welcome.

m
mykey6375 · September 8, 2025

Kibitzing, but "quantum theory texts" is too vague. Your suggestions for "where to start" are advanced topics. Eg, for quantum computing, all you need is linear algebra. That's a starting point. You definitely can't do squat in QM without calculus. If that's not in your bag yet, that'd be the place to start. If differential equations sounds scary, that has to be next. And so on. I can help more if you follow up with better precision. Also, look for Dr. Collier's earlier videos on physics books & how to learn physics.

S
Sergio Klar Velazquez · September 8, 2025

I used to watch Sabine's video until she lost the plot. I didn't know it was grifting, I'm curious about what she is getting for shiting on science now.

m
mykey6375 · September 8, 2025

Yes, but please let your observation that she's shitting on science suffice. If you upvoted that topic, what "as many times as you like" really means is you can still un-upvote. Please do that. Everyone! Thanks!

P
PJ B · September 8, 2025

NASA and Sabine, I want all the juicy details on either...

m
mykey6375 · September 8, 2025

How about no, don't waste our precious Dr. Collier talk time on this "juicy" but worthless nothing-we-can-do-about-it topic? Please un-upvote. That's my opinion, but Dr. Collier has said as much. Thanks in advance.

W
William Gross · September 8, 2025

Please Jesus explain Sabine Hossenfelder.

m
mykey6375 · September 8, 2025

Dr. Collier has just now said there's basically nothing to explain. Please accept her word. Please un-upvote. Yes, you can still take that vote back.

B
Beastw1ck · September 8, 2025

Man I really want to hear what the deal with Sabine is. I’m so confused by whatever is happening there.

A
Angela Collier (acollierastro) · September 8, 2025

imo it will be a very boring video with 'obviously this person makes money shit talking a thing, built a business, and must continue to do it for cash' there isn't much there lol. wouldn't be main channel video

N
Nearby Couch · September 8, 2025

Aw man the others are good but it’s Maxwell time

m
mykey6375 · September 17, 2025

Well. I don't know what I'd do if I were in Dr. Collier's place. I think the poll is an example in miniature of the big problems we're experiencing not for the first time in our 250 years, only more acutely than ever before, I feel. This democracy has been so warped by technology enabling it to achieve its limits, that it is suffering from metal fatigue & is failing the test of this moment like no other time that it has faced. Our little corner of reality, of Angela's channel, is a toy model exposing for us how the wants of the many can serve to impede the idealistic visions of the few. To be clear, I am not a physicist. I am a fan of the subject. I took the Theoretical Minimum classes. We were encouraged to believe we could understand key things about the work real physicists do at sort of the same level as them. We will get the gist. Maybe not enough to contribute work to working physicists, but not excluding so much of the technical detail that our understandings would be misleading if we should spread them to the rest of the non-expert public. In short, we could become physics communicators. We were also encouraged to outright start to call ourselves "physicists". I would have taken another path had I wanted to be able to call myself that. I am a dilletante. All that said, people with a strong enough interest in physics to have a passing knowledge of the math, & the theory, & have some command of the evidence, & continue to retain an abiding interest in new discoveries, new abilities, & the bright future of the living subject of physics... um, we are a market niche that slips thru the cracks. Materials for the serious student truly dedicated to becoming a working physicist are opaque & full of the technical capabilities. The intuitions to hold all the ideas while staying sane, this is a task largely left up to the student. You will know the facts. If you can't make sense of them, you will drop out. OTOH, skipping over the not-quite-physicists, all the at-large market for intuitive understanding of what physicists are up to, needs the technical details dumbed down, bc that audience has such a small bandwidth to give up to this one subject. You don't know (and I do) what's wrong with the description of the Higgs field you've been sold. You don't know that the story you've been fed about Hawking radiation is a toy model of a technical discussion that's only slightly more complicated. But the real explanation is not suitable for your market segment. I can't tell you how hard it was for me to dig up a sufficiently dumbed down picture of the actual physics we find in the minds of physicists. Enter Dr. Collier's channel. The reason Maxwell came in second is bc a certain batch of people like me have come here seeking an oasis in the desert. We used to be fans of Sabine. Along with Matt Strassler. For both of them, the realities of their life & their career have changed their course. I certainly don't begrudge them that. I don't like the Sabine as I know her now. But both Matt & Angela are wonderful people. I want them to have the life & career in physics that they aspire to. Talking about Maxwell, as opposed to talking about Sabine, would (we hope) help us to understand the struggles of even a genius expert in physics exploring new physics before the maturity of the subject area makes it easy to assimilate & compress into one easily-digested story. We know the equations. We have solved the problem-set problems. We want to know the thought process, to let us see what's going on underneath & inside the formulas. How we can think of the physics with the full intuitive power of getting the physics properly. With our GROK dialled up all the way. The public at large is never going to be exposed to this level of knowing physics. But in some sense, we are like those rich folks who think capitalism is morally satisfying. Who just want to rid themselves of the injustice of taxes stealing their hard-won wealth. Who don't believe they ever felt the warmth of "the common good" in their life's experiences. Don't believe any attempts to share their deserved privilege with undeserving masses is justifiable. Like them, bc as their viewpoint is numerically small in the one-person/one-vote landscape, so too is my viewpoint amid the public who have so many bigger fish to fry. Like them, I too will be a minority interest for as far into the future as we can reasonably imagine. We seek our way to paradise. For me, that might be Dr. Collier. For rich people, the answer seems to be, to bend the obsolete rules of our democracy up to & past its breaking point. Please tell me my cause is not lost. Or, disillusion me. As matters sit, I'm still rooting for Dr. Collier.